Literature DB >> 11000272

An alternate form of Ku80 is required for DNA end-binding activity in mammalian mitochondria.

G Coffey1, C Campbell.   

Abstract

Mammalian mitochondrial DNA end-binding activity is nearly indistinguishable from that of nuclear Ku. This observation led to the hypothesis that mitochondrial DNA end-binding activity is in part dependent upon Ku80 gene expression. To test this hypothesis, we assayed for Ku activity in mitochondrial extracts prepared from the xrs-5 hamster cell line that lacks Ku80 mRNA expression. Mitochondrial protein extracts prepared from this cell line lacked the DNA end-binding activity found in similar extracts prepared from wild-type cells. Azacytidine-reverted xrs-5 cells that acquired nuclear DNA end-binding activity also acquired mitochondrial DNA end-binding activity. Western blot analysis of human mitochondrial protein extracts using a monoclonal antibody specific for an N-terminal epitope of Ku80 identified a protein with an apparent molecular weight of 68 kDa. This mitochondrial protein was not detected by a monoclonal antibody specific for an epitope at the C-terminal end of Ku80. Consistently, while both the N- and C-terminal Ku80 monoclonal antibodies supershifted the nuclear DNA end-binding complex on an electrophoretic mobility shift assay, only the N-terminal monoclonal antibody supershifted the mitochondrial DNA end-binding complex. To confirm that the 68 kDa Ku protein was not a consequence of nuclear protein contamination of mitochondrial preparations, highly purified intact nuclei and mitochondria were treated with proteinase K which traverses the pores of intact nuclei but gains limited access into intact mitochondria. Ku80 in purified intact nuclei was sensitive to treatment with this protease, while the 68 kDa Ku protein characteristic of purified intact mitochondria was resistant. Further, immunocytochemical analysis revealed the co-localization of the N-terminal specific Ku80 monoclonal antibody with a mitochondrial-targeted green fluorescence protein. Mitochondrial localization of the C-terminal Ku80 monoclonal antibody was not observed. These data are consistent with the hypothesis that a C-terminally truncated form of Ku80 is localized in mammalian mitochondria where it functions in a DNA end-binding activity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11000272      PMCID: PMC110772          DOI: 10.1093/nar/28.19.3793

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res        ISSN: 0305-1048            Impact factor:   16.971


  47 in total

1.  Ku70-deficient embryonic stem cells have increased ionizing radiosensitivity, defective DNA end-binding activity, and inability to support V(D)J recombination.

Authors:  Y Gu; S Jin; Y Gao; D T Weaver; F W Alt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-07-22       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Ku86 defines the genetic defect and restores X-ray resistance and V(D)J recombination to complementation group 5 hamster cell mutants.

Authors:  A Errami; V Smider; W K Rathmell; D M He; E A Hendrickson; M Z Zdzienicka; G Chu
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 4.272

3.  Ku protein stimulates DNA end joining by mammalian DNA ligases: a direct role for Ku in repair of DNA double-strand breaks.

Authors:  D A Ramsden; M Gellert
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1998-01-15       Impact factor: 11.598

4.  Defining the minimal domain of Ku80 for interaction with Ku70.

Authors:  O Osipovich; S K Durum; K Muegge
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1997-10-24       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 5.  Recognition and binding of mitochondrial presequences during the import of proteins into mitochondria.

Authors:  D Roise
Journal:  J Bioenerg Biomembr       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 2.945

6.  Molecular and biochemical characterization of xrs mutants defective in Ku80.

Authors:  B K Singleton; A Priestley; H Steingrimsdottir; D Gell; T Blunt; S P Jackson; A R Lehmann; P A Jeggo
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 4.272

7.  A central region of Ku80 mediates interaction with Ku70 in vivo.

Authors:  R B Cary; F Chen; Z Shen; D J Chen
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1998-02-15       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Ku86-deficient mice exhibit severe combined immunodeficiency and defective processing of V(D)J recombination intermediates.

Authors:  C Zhu; M A Bogue; D S Lim; P Hasty; D B Roth
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1996-08-09       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  Growth retardation and leaky SCID phenotype of Ku70-deficient mice.

Authors:  Y Gu; K J Seidl; G A Rathbun; C Zhu; J P Manis; N van der Stoep; L Davidson; H L Cheng; J M Sekiguchi; K Frank; P Stanhope-Baker; M S Schlissel; D B Roth; F W Alt
Journal:  Immunity       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 31.745

10.  Nuclear targeting of aequorin. A new approach for measuring nuclear Ca2+ concentration in intact cells.

Authors:  M Brini; R Marsault; C Bastianutto; T Pozzan; R Rizzuto
Journal:  Cell Calcium       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 6.817

View more
  18 in total

1.  Role of tyrosyl-DNA phosphodiesterase (TDP1) in mitochondria.

Authors:  Benu Brata Das; Thomas S Dexheimer; Kasthuraiah Maddali; Yves Pommier
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-11-01       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Mitochondrial genome maintenance: roles for nuclear nonhomologous end-joining proteins in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Lidza Kalifa; Daniel F Quintana; Laura K Schiraldi; Naina Phadnis; Garry L Coles; Rey A Sia; Elaine A Sia
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mhr1 can bind Xho I-induced mitochondrial DNA double-strand breaks in vivo.

Authors:  Kanchanjunga Prasai; Lucy C Robinson; Kelly Tatchell; Lynn Harrison
Journal:  Mitochondrion       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 4.160

4.  Transient mitochondrial DNA double strand breaks in mice cause accelerated aging phenotypes in a ROS-dependent but p53/p21-independent manner.

Authors:  Milena Pinto; Alicia M Pickrell; Xiao Wang; Sandra R Bacman; Aixin Yu; Aline Hida; Lloye M Dillon; Paul D Morton; Thomas R Malek; Siôn L Williams; Carlos T Moraes
Journal:  Cell Death Differ       Date:  2016-12-02       Impact factor: 15.828

Review 5.  DNA damage related crosstalk between the nucleus and mitochondria.

Authors:  Mohammad Saki; Aishwarya Prakash
Journal:  Free Radic Biol Med       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 7.376

6.  Dual localization of human DNA topoisomerase IIIalpha to mitochondria and nucleus.

Authors:  Yong Wang; Yi Lisa Lyu; James C Wang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-09-03       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Ku80-deleted cells are defective at base excision repair.

Authors:  Han Li; Teresa Marple; Paul Hasty
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2013-04-06       Impact factor: 2.433

Review 8.  The Mitochondrial Response to DNA Damage.

Authors:  Ziye Rong; Peipei Tu; Peiqi Xu; Yan Sun; Fangfang Yu; Na Tu; Lixia Guo; Yanan Yang
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2021-05-12

9.  Human telomerase acts as a hTR-independent reverse transcriptase in mitochondria.

Authors:  Nilesh K Sharma; Aurelio Reyes; Paula Green; Matthieu J Caron; Marcelo G Bonini; Donna M Gordon; Ian J Holt; Janine Hertzog Santos
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Adaptation of topoisomerase I paralogs to nuclear and mitochondrial DNA.

Authors:  Ilaria Dalla Rosa; Steffi Goffart; Melanie Wurm; Constanze Wiek; Frank Essmann; Stefan Sobek; Peter Schroeder; Hongliang Zhang; Jean Krutmann; Helmut Hanenberg; Klaus Schulze-Osthoff; Christian Mielke; Yves Pommier; Fritz Boege; Morten O Christensen
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-08-31       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.