Literature DB >> 11000175

Evaluation of the accuracy of gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MR imaging in the detection and characterization of focal liver lesions.

G Pirovano1, A Vanzulli, L Marti-Bonmati, L Grazioli, R Manfredi, A Greco, N Holzknecht, H E Daldrup-Link, E Rummeny, B Hamm, V Arneson, L Imperatori, M A Kirchin, A Spinazzi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the extent to which hepatic lesion characterization and detection is improved by using gadobenate dimeglumine for enhancement of MR images.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty-six patients were imaged before gadobenate dimeglumine administration, immediately after the 2 mL/sec bolus administration of a 0.05 mmol/kg dose (dynamic imaging), and at 60-120 min after the IV infusion at 10 mL/min of a further 0.05 nmol/kg dose (delayed imaging). The accuracy for lesion characterization was assessed for a total of 107 lesions. Sensitivity for lesion detection was assessed for a total of 149 lesions detected on either intra-operative sonography, iodized oil CT, CT during arterial portography, or follow-up contrast-enhanced CT as the gold standard.
RESULTS: The accuracy in differentiating benign from malignant liver lesions increased from 75% and 82% (the findings of two observers) on unenhanced images alone, to 89% and 80% on dynamic images alone (p<0.001, p = 0.8), and to 90.7% when combining the unenhanced and dynamic image sets (p<0.001, p = 0.023). Delayed images did not further improve accuracy (90% and 91%; p = 0.002, p< 0.05). A similar trend was apparent in terms of accuracy for specific diagnosis: values ranged from 49% and 62% on unenhanced images alone, to 76% and 70% on combined unenhanced and dynamic images (p<0.001, p = 0.06), and to 75% and 70% on inclusion of delayed images (p<0.001, p = 0.12). The sensitivity for lesion detection increased from 77% and 81% on unenhanced images alone, to 87% and 85% on combined unenhanced and dynamic images (p = 0.001, p = 0.267), and to 92% and 89% when all images were considered (p<0.001, p = 0.01).
CONCLUSION: Contrast-enhanced dynamic MR imaging with gadobenate dimeglumine significantly increases sensitivity and accuracy over unenhanced imaging for the characterization of focal hepatic lesions, and delayed MR imaging contributes to the improved detection of lesions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11000175     DOI: 10.2214/ajr.175.4.1751111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  18 in total

Review 1.  Imaging of liver metastases with contrast-specific low-MI real-time ultrasound and SonoVue.

Authors:  T Albrecht; A Oldenburg; J Hohmann; J Skrok; C W Hoffmann; S Schettler; K J Wolf
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  [Current status of MRI diagnostics with liver-specific contrast agents. Gd-EOB-DTPA and Gd-BOPTA].

Authors:  C Stroszczynski; G Gaffke; M Gnauck; F Streitparth; G Wieners; E Lopez-Häninnen
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 0.635

3.  Malignant focal liver lesions at contrast-enhanced ultrasonography and magnetic resonance with hepatospecific contrast agent.

Authors:  M D'Onofrio; S Crosara; R De Robertis; S Canestrini; V Cantisani; G Morana; R Pozzi Mucelli
Journal:  Ultrasound       Date:  2013-12-13

4.  Diagnosis value of focal liver lesions with SonoVue®-enhanced ultrasound compared with contrast-enhanced computed tomography and contrast-enhanced MRI: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yang Guang; LiMei Xie; Hailong Ding; AiLu Cai; Ying Huang
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-08-18       Impact factor: 4.553

5.  Role of diffusion-weighted imaging, apparent diffusion coefficient and correlation with hepatobiliary phase findings in the differentiation of hepatocellular carcinoma from dysplastic nodules in cirrhotic liver.

Authors:  Riccardo Inchingolo; Anna Maria De Gaetano; Davide Curione; Marzia Ciresa; Luca Miele; Maurizio Pompili; Fabio Maria Vecchio; Felice Giuliante; Lorenzo Bonomo
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-11-28       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 6.  Hepatobiliary MR imaging with gadolinium-based contrast agents.

Authors:  Alex Frydrychowicz; Meghan G Lubner; Jeffrey J Brown; Elmar M Merkle; Scott K Nagle; Neil M Rofsky; Scott B Reeder
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  Respiratory gated diffusion-weighted imaging of the liver: value of apparent diffusion coefficient measurements in the differentiation between most commonly encountered benign and malignant focal liver lesions.

Authors:  Sofia Gourtsoyianni; Nickolas Papanikolaou; Spyros Yarmenitis; Thomas Maris; Apostolos Karantanas; Nicholas Gourtsoyiannis
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-11-10       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced liver MR imaging: value of dynamic and delayed imaging for the characterization and detection of focal liver lesions.

Authors:  Young Kon Kim; Jeong Min Lee; Chong Soo Kim
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-11-05       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Wireless amplified NMR detector for improved visibility of image contrast in heterogeneous lesions.

Authors:  Xianchun Zeng; Shengqiang Xu; Changyong Cao; Jian Wang; Chunqi Qian
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2018-07-16       Impact factor: 4.044

10.  Liver specific magnetic resonance imaging contrast medium for evaluation of focal liver lesions - Initial experience at a service hospital.

Authors:  R A George; S C Godara; V Srinivas
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2012-08-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.