Literature DB >> 10999610

Is color-flow duplex a good diagnostic test for detection of isolated calf vein thrombosis in high-risk patients?

M K Eskandari1, H Sugimoto, T Richardson, M W Webster, M S Makaroun.   

Abstract

Color-flow duplex scanning (CDS) is a good diagnostic test for lower extremity proximal deep vein thrombosis (DVT). This report aims to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of CDS in detecting isolated calf DVT in two in-hospital populations. A total of 166 patients had routine DVT testing with both CDS and venography: 99 total joint arthroplasty patients and 67 symptomatic in-hospital patients. Isolated calf DVT was noted in 34% of arthroplasty patients and 12% of symptomatic in-hospital patients. Peroneal DVT was most common. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value (with 95% confidence interval [CI]) of CDS in detecting isolated calf DVT in the symptomatic in-hospital group was 39% (16%-62%), 98% (94%-99%), 88% (65%-99%), and 81% (71%-91%), respectively. In the arthroplasty patients these values were 13% (3%-23%), 92% (85%-99%), 60% (30%-90%), and 55% (45%-65%), respectively. CDS has a low sensitivity in detecting isolated calf DVT among hospitalized patients and cannot be deemed an effective tool for identifying clots limited to only one or two tibial vessels.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10999610     DOI: 10.1177/000331970005100901

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angiology        ISSN: 0003-3197            Impact factor:   3.619


  8 in total

1.  Literature search parameters marginally improved the pooled estimate accuracy for ultrasound in detecting deep venous thrombosis.

Authors:  Behrouz Kassaï; Sandrine Sonié; Nirav R Shah; Jean-Pierre Boissel
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 2.  Management of Venous Thromboembolisms: Part I. The Consensus for Deep Vein Thrombosis.

Authors:  Kang-Ling Wang; Pao-Hsien Chu; Cheng-Han Lee; Pei-Ying Pai; Pao-Yen Lin; Kou-Gi Shyu; Wei-Tien Chang; Kuan-Ming Chiu; Chien-Lung Huang; Chung-Yi Lee; Yen-Hung Lin; Chun-Chieh Wang; Hsueh-Wei Yen; Wei-Hsian Yin; Hung-I Yeh; Chern-En Chiang; Shing-Jong Lin; San-Jou Yeh
Journal:  Acta Cardiol Sin       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.672

Review 3.  [Diagnostic imaging of venous disease: Part I: methods in the diagnosis of veins and thrombosis].

Authors:  K Krüger; J Wildberger; P Haage; P Landwehr
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 4.  A systematic review of the accuracy of ultrasound in the diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis in asymptomatic patients.

Authors:  Behrouz Kassaï; Jean-Pierre Boissel; Michel Cucherat; Sandrine Sonie; Nirav R Shah; Alain Leizorovicz
Journal:  Thromb Haemost       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 5.249

5.  Evaluation of deep vein thrombosis with multidetector row CT after orthopedic arthroplasty: a prospective study for comparison with Doppler sonography.

Authors:  Sung Su Byun; Jeong Ho Kim; Youn Jeong Kim; Yong Sun Jeon; Yong Sun Chun; Chul Hi Park; Won Hong Kim
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2008 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.500

Review 6.  Strategies for diagnosis and prevention of venous thromboembolism during pregnancy.

Authors:  Shalini Jain Bagaria; V B Bagaria
Journal:  J Pregnancy       Date:  2011-07-21

7.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography for deep vein thrombosis.

Authors:  Steve Goodacre; Fiona Sampson; Steve Thomas; Edwin van Beek; Alex Sutton
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2005-10-03       Impact factor: 1.930

8.  The rate of missed diagnosis of lower-limb DVT by ultrasound amounts to 50% or so in patients without symptoms of DVT: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yuhong Zhang; Haifa Xia; Yaxin Wang; Lin Chen; Shengnan Li; Idrees Ali Hussein; Yan Wu; You Shang; Shanglong Yao; Ruofei Du
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 1.817

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.