Literature DB >> 10998648

Will endovascular repair replace open surgery for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair?

C K Zarins1, Y G Wolf, W A Lee, B B Hill, I V Olcott C, E J Harris, R L Dalman, T J Fogarty.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate of the impact of endovascular aneurysm repair on the rate of open surgical repair and on the overall treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs).
METHODS: All patients with AAA who were treated during two consecutive 40-month periods were reviewed. During the first period, only open surgical repair was performed; during the subsequent 40 months, endovascular repair and open surgical repair were treatment options.
RESULTS: A total of 727 patients with AAA were treated during the entire period. During the initial 40 months, 268 patients were treated with open surgical repair, including 216 infrarenal (81%), 43 complex (16%), and 9 ruptured (3%) aortic aneurysms. During the subsequent 40 months, 459 patients with AAA were treated (71% increase). There was no significant change in the number of patients undergoing open surgical repair and no significant difference in the rate of infrarenal (238 [77%]) and complex (51 [16%]) repairs. A total of 353 patients were referred for endovascular repair. Of these, 190 (54%) were considered candidates for endovascular repair based on computed tomography or arteriographic morphologic criteria. Analyzing a subgroup of 123 patients, the most common primary reasons for ineligibility for endovascular repair were related to morphology of the neck in 80 patients (65%) and of the iliac arteries in 35 patients (28%). A total of 149 patients underwent endovascular repair. Of these, the procedure was successful in 147 (99%), and 2 (1%) patients underwent surgical conversion. The hospital death rate was 0%, and the 30-day death rate was 1%. During a follow-up period of 1 to 39 months (mean 12 +/- 9), 21 secondary procedures to treat endoleak (20) or to maintain graft limb patency (1) were performed in 17 patients (11%). There were no aneurysm ruptures or aneurysm-related deaths.
CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular repair appears to have augmented treatment options rather than replaced open surgical repair for patients with AAA. Patients who previously were not candidates for repair because of medical comorbidity may now be safely treated with endovascular repair.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10998648      PMCID: PMC1421182          DOI: 10.1097/00000658-200010000-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  6 in total

1.  Risk of rupture of large abdominal aortic aneurysms. Disagreement among vascular surgeons.

Authors:  F A Lederle
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1996-05-13

2.  Should endovascular surgery lower the threshold for repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms?

Authors:  S R Finlayson; J D Birkmeyer; M F Fillinger; J L Cronenwett
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.268

3.  Abdominal aortic aneurysm: a 6-year comparison of endovascular versus transabdominal repair.

Authors:  W S Moore; V S Kashyap; C L Vescera; W J Quiñones-Baldrich
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  AneuRx stent graft versus open surgical repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: multicenter prospective clinical trial.

Authors:  C K Zarins; R A White; D Schwarten; E Kinney; E B Diethrich; K J Hodgson; T J Fogarty
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 4.268

5.  Initial experience with endovascular aneurysm repair: comparison of early results with outcome of conventional open repair.

Authors:  D C Brewster; S C Geller; J A Kaufman; R P Cambria; J P Gertler; G M LaMuraglia; S Atamian; W M Abbott
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 4.268

6.  Rupture of known abdominal aortic aneurysms: an ethical dilemma.

Authors:  J J Piotrowski; R Akhrass; J J Alexander; J P Yuhas; C P Brandt
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 0.688

  6 in total
  6 in total

Review 1.  Endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

Authors:  M G A Norwood; G M Lloyd; M J Bown; G Fishwick; N J London; R D Sayers
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 2.401

2.  Embolization of a Recurrent Type 2 Endoleak Using the Liquid Embolic n-Butyl Cyanoacrylate.

Authors:  Andrew Wilmot; S William Stavropoulos
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 1.513

3.  Prospective, intraindividual comparison of MRI versus MDCT for endoleak detection after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Authors:  Mario Alerci; Michel Oberson; Antonella Fogliata; Augusto Gallino; Peter Vock; Rolf Wyttenbach
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-12-23       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Suitability of endovascular repair with current stent grafts for abdominal aortic aneurysm in Korean patients.

Authors:  Kay-Hyun Park; Cheong Lim; Jae Hang Lee; Jae Suk Yoo
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 2.153

5.  Morphological applicability of currently available stent grafts in the endovascular repair of asymptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysm in East-Central European patients.

Authors:  Jolanta Tomczak; Łukasz Dzieciuchowicz
Journal:  Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej       Date:  2021-03-27       Impact factor: 1.426

6.  Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm: an evidence-based analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2002-03-01
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.