OBJECTIVE: To assess the compliance, tolerance and efficacy of a short chemoprophylaxis regimen (IR) for tuberculosis using isoniazid (INH) plus rifampin (RIF) during 3 months versus a standard regimen (I) of isoniazid during 12 months in HIV positive patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Prospective, comparative, randomized and open clinical trial in four general hospitals and one prison hospital of Castilla-La Mancha. Prophylaxis was administered to PPD-positive patients and to anergic patients according to the CDC recommendations (1991). Patients were randomized in two treatment groups: regimen IR, isoniazid 300 mg daily and rifampin 600 mg daily; regimen I, isoniazid 300 mg during 12 months. RESULTS:133 patients were included, 64 to regimen I and 69 to regimen IR. Regimen IR had a better tolerance with a 28% of adverse effects versus 55% in regimen I. Hepatotoxicity was more frequent in regimen I with a RR = 2.2 (CI 95% 1.23-4.01). Severe hepatotoxicity leading to treatment withdrawal was related to drug administration time and was more frequent in the 12 months regimen group. Short regimen showed a better compliance, without significant differences. Tuberculosis incidence rate was a 4.23 cases/100 persons--year for regimen I and 2.08 in regimen IR, with a relative risk for developing tuberculosis with regimen IR group of 0.51 (CI 95% 0.09-2.8) versus regimen I group, without statistical significance. Prison stay was associated to a significant risk for tuberculosis, regardless of both regimens (RR = 9.2 CI 95%, 1.06-80.2). CONCLUSIONS: In HIV-infected patients with PPD(+) or anergic, regimen with IR is at least as effective as regimen I for preventing the development of tuberculous disease, and has less adverse effects.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To assess the compliance, tolerance and efficacy of a short chemoprophylaxis regimen (IR) for tuberculosis using isoniazid (INH) plus rifampin (RIF) during 3 months versus a standard regimen (I) of isoniazid during 12 months in HIV positive patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Prospective, comparative, randomized and open clinical trial in four general hospitals and one prison hospital of Castilla-La Mancha. Prophylaxis was administered to PPD-positive patients and to anergic patients according to the CDC recommendations (1991). Patients were randomized in two treatment groups: regimen IR, isoniazid 300 mg daily and rifampin 600 mg daily; regimen I, isoniazid 300 mg during 12 months. RESULTS: 133 patients were included, 64 to regimen I and 69 to regimen IR. Regimen IR had a better tolerance with a 28% of adverse effects versus 55% in regimen I. Hepatotoxicity was more frequent in regimen I with a RR = 2.2 (CI 95% 1.23-4.01). Severe hepatotoxicity leading to treatment withdrawal was related to drug administration time and was more frequent in the 12 months regimen group. Short regimen showed a better compliance, without significant differences. Tuberculosis incidence rate was a 4.23 cases/100 persons--year for regimen I and 2.08 in regimen IR, with a relative risk for developing tuberculosis with regimen IR group of 0.51 (CI 95% 0.09-2.8) versus regimen I group, without statistical significance. Prison stay was associated to a significant risk for tuberculosis, regardless of both regimens (RR = 9.2 CI 95%, 1.06-80.2). CONCLUSIONS: In HIV-infectedpatients with PPD(+) or anergic, regimen with IR is at least as effective as regimen I for preventing the development of tuberculous disease, and has less adverse effects.
Authors: Mercedes Yanes-Lane; Edgar Ortiz-Brizuela; Jonathon R Campbell; Andrea Benedetti; Gavin Churchyard; Olivia Oxlade; Dick Menzies Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2021-09-14 Impact factor: 11.613
Authors: Asuncion Diaz; Mercedes Diez; Maria Jose Bleda; Mikel Aldamiz; Miguel Camafort; Xabier Camino; Concepcion Cepeda; Asuncion Costa; Oscar Ferrero; Paloma Geijo; Jose Antonio Iribarren; Santiago Moreno; Maria Elena Moreno; Pablo Labarga; Javier Pinilla; Joseba Portu; Federico Pulido; Carmen Rosa; Juan Miguel Santamaría; Mauricio Telenti; Luis Trapiella; Monica Trastoy; Pompeyo Viciana Journal: BMC Infect Dis Date: 2010-09-14 Impact factor: 3.090
Authors: Líbia C R V Moura; Ricardo A A Ximenes; Heloísa L Ramos; Demócrito B Miranda Filho; Carolina D P Freitas; Rosangela M S Silva; Isabella Coimbra; Joanna d'Arc L Batista; Ulisses R Montarroyos; Maria de Fátima P Militão Albuquerque Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2011-09-05 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Timothy R Sterling; Gibril Njie; Dominik Zenner; David L Cohn; Randall Reves; Amina Ahmed; Dick Menzies; C Robert Horsburgh; Charles M Crane; Marcos Burgos; Philip LoBue; Carla A Winston; Robert Belknap Journal: MMWR Recomm Rep Date: 2020-02-14
Authors: Esther Arguello Perez; Susan K Seo; William J Schneider; Cynthia Eisenstein; Arthur E Brown Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2017-11-29 Impact factor: 9.079