Literature DB >> 10996328

Differential localisation of an Eimeria tenella aspartyl proteinase during the infection process.

L Jean1, J Grosclaude, M Labbé, F Tomley, P Péry.   

Abstract

Aspartyl proteinases are essential for the survival of many pathogens. A single copy gene in species of Eimeria encodes an aspartyl proteinase, which we propose should be called eimepsin to conform to the commonly used names of this family of proteinases. An epitope map, constructed using BIAcore technology, confirmed the specificity of 14 mAbs for eimepsin and defined four antigenic domains, which were conserved between native and recombinant forms of eimepsin. In resting sporozoites, mAb defining antigenic domains I and II stained the refractile body organelles, whereas those defining antigenic domains III and IV stained cytoplasmic granules. During host cell invasion, the staining patterns of mAb defining antigenic domains I, III and IV changed dramatically with the apical tips of invading sporozoites becoming strongly stained. In contrast, mAb defining antigenic domain II continued to stain only the refractile bodies. During early schizogony, mAb to all four domains stained the single fused refractile body, but when schizonts matured, mAb to antigenic domains I, III and IV stained the apical tip of merozoites whereas those to antigenic domain II continued to follow the developmental redistribution of the refractile body. Irrespective of localisation, mAb to three antigenic domains recognised a polypeptide of 49 kDa, which from N-terminal sequencing corresponds to a mature form of eimepsin. Staining with fluorescent pepstatin localised a mature, active form of eimepsin to the refractile bodies of the sporozoite, schizont and first generation merozoite. It remains to be determined whether eimepsin has a catalytic function within the refractile body or whether the activated enzyme is stored in the refractile body so that it can be rapidly redistributed to the apical tip during parasite invasion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10996328     DOI: 10.1016/s0020-7519(00)00099-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Parasitol        ISSN: 0020-7519            Impact factor:   3.981


  11 in total

1.  The origins of apicomplexan sequence innovation.

Authors:  James Wasmuth; Jennifer Daub; José Manuel Peregrín-Alvarez; Constance A M Finney; John Parkinson
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2009-04-10       Impact factor: 9.043

2.  Selection and characterization of a precocious line of Eimeria media.

Authors:  Xiaolong Gu; Hongbin Liu; Chao Li; Sufang Fang; Ping Cui; Qin Liao; Sixin Zhang; Si Wang; Chunhui Duan; Fang Yu; Xun Suo; Xianyong Liu
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2019-08-12       Impact factor: 2.289

3.  Inhibitory effects of pepstatin A and mefloquine on the growth of Babesia parasites.

Authors:  Tserendorj Munkhjargal; Mahmoud AbouLaila; Mohamad Alaa Terkawi; Thillaiampalam Sivakumar; Madoka Ichikawa; Batdorj Davaasuren; Tserendorj Nyamjargal; Naoaki Yokoyama; Ikuo Igarashi
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2012-08-13       Impact factor: 2.345

4.  Quantitative proteomic studies in resistance mechanisms of Eimeria tenella against polyether ionophores.

Authors:  Ahmed Thabet; Walther Honscha; Arwid Daugschies; Berit Bangoura
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 2.289

5.  Identification and characterization of a cathepsin-L-like peptidase in Eimeria tenella.

Authors:  Renqiang Liu; Xueting Ma; Aijun Liu; Lei Zhang; Jianping Cai; Ming Wang
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 2.289

6.  Proteomic comparison of four Eimeria tenella life-cycle stages: unsporulated oocyst, sporulated oocyst, sporozoite and second-generation merozoite.

Authors:  Kalpana Lal; Elizabeth Bromley; Richard Oakes; Judith Helena Prieto; Sanya J Sanderson; Dominic Kurian; Lawrence Hunt; John R Yates; Jonathan M Wastling; Robert E Sinden; Fiona M Tomley
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.984

7.  Identification and characterization of an Eimeria-conserved protein in Eimeria tenella.

Authors:  Hui Dong; Yange Wang; Hongyu Han; Ting Li; Qiping Zhao; Shunhai Zhu; Liujia Li; Youling Wu; Bing Huang
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2013-11-24       Impact factor: 2.289

Review 8.  Eimeria proteins: order amidst disorder.

Authors:  Joshua Seun Olajide; Zigang Qu; Shunli Yang; Oyeseyi Joshua Oyelade; Jianping Cai
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2022-01-24       Impact factor: 3.876

9.  Reverse genetics screen identifies six proteins important for malaria development in the mosquito.

Authors:  Andrea Ecker; Ellen S C Bushell; Rita Tewari; Robert E Sinden
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2008-08-27       Impact factor: 3.501

10.  Stage-specific expression of protease genes in the apicomplexan parasite, Eimeria tenella.

Authors:  Marilyn Katrib; Rowan J Ikin; Fabien Brossier; Michelle Robinson; Iveta Slapetova; Philippa A Sharman; Robert A Walker; Sabina I Belli; Fiona M Tomley; Nicholas C Smith
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 3.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.