Literature DB >> 10994673

A threshold method to improve standardized uptake value reproducibility.

J R Lee1, M T Madsen, D Bushnel, Y Menda.   

Abstract

Although standardized uptake values (SUV) are widely used to quantify the uptake of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) in tumours, there are systematic differences in the way this index is applied by different investigators. The aims of this study were to compare the effects of using maximum or mean region counts in the calculation of SUV and to investigate an alternative technique based on a fixed fraction of the maximum counts. Simulated PET projections of the thorax were generated together with spherical lesions that varied in diameter from 1.6 to 4.8 cm with uptake values of 2, 4 and 8. The lesion SUVs were determined using either the maximum (SUVmax) or mean count (SUVmean) values found in regions circumscribing the lesion. In addition, average values were calculated that only included region pixels that exceeded a selected fraction of maximum value (SUV0.6max or SUV0.75max). These methods were also applied to six clinical 18F-FDG PET studies with a total of 12 lesions. The SUVs for these lesions were determined independently by four observers. Decreases with respect to SUVmax of 57%, 23% and 14% were found for SUVmean, SUV0.6max and SUV0.75max approaches respectively in the simulation study. The variation in SUVmean with region size was 35%, while the SUV0.6max and SUV0.75max was less than 3%. Similar results were obtained for the clinical data. We conclude that the proposed technique produces SUVs that are essentially independent of lesion region size and shape. It is expected that this will provide a more stable and reliable result than current approaches.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10994673     DOI: 10.1097/00006231-200007000-00013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nucl Med Commun        ISSN: 0143-3636            Impact factor:   1.690


  24 in total

1.  Facilitating multimodal preclinical imaging studies in mice by using an immobilization bed.

Authors:  Geoffrey S Nelson; Jessica Perez; Marta Vilalta; Marta V Colomer; Rehan Ali; Edward Graves
Journal:  Comp Med       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 0.982

2.  Effects of ROI definition and reconstruction method on quantitative outcome and applicability in a response monitoring trial.

Authors:  Nanda C Krak; R Boellaard; Otto S Hoekstra; Jos W R Twisk; Corneline J Hoekstra; Adriaan A Lammertsma
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-10-15       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Use of pretreatment metabolic tumour volumes to predict the outcome of pharyngeal cancer treated by definitive radiotherapy.

Authors:  Chia-Hung Kao; Shih-Chieh Lin; Te-Chun Hsieh; Kuo-Yang Yen; Shih-Neng Yang; Yao-Ching Wang; Ji-An Liang; Chun-Hung Hua; Shang-Wen Chen
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  FLT-PET imaging of radiation responses in murine tumors.

Authors:  M H Pan; S C Huang; Y P Liao; D Schaue; C C Wang; D B Stout; J R Barrio; W H McBride
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2008-08-01       Impact factor: 3.488

5.  [F-18]-Fluoro-2-deoxy-D: -glucose positron emission tomography as a tool for early detection of immunotherapy response in a murine B cell lymphoma model.

Authors:  Coralie Chaise; Emmanuel Itti; Yolande Petegnief; Evelyne Wirquin; Christiane Copie-Bergman; Jean-Pierre Farcet; Marie-Hélène Delfau-Larue; Michel Meignan; Jean-Noël Talbot; Valérie Molinier-Frenkel
Journal:  Cancer Immunol Immunother       Date:  2006-12-14       Impact factor: 6.968

Review 6.  Importance of quantification for the analysis of PET data in oncology: review of current methods and trends for the future.

Authors:  Giampaolo Tomasi; Federico Turkheimer; Eric Aboagye
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 3.488

7.  Predictions of Pathological Features and Recurrence Based on FDG-PET Findings of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma after Trimodal Therapy.

Authors:  Yoichi Hamai; Manabu Emi; Yuta Ibuki; Yuji Murakami; Ikuno Nishibuchi; Yasushi Nagata; Takaoki Furukawa; Tomoaki Kurokawa; Manato Ohsawa; Toru Yoshikawa; Morihito Okada
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  Reproducibility of semi-quantitative parameters in FDG-PET using two different PET scanners: influence of attenuation correction method and examination interval.

Authors:  Tomohito Kamibayashi; Tatsuro Tsuchida; Yoshiki Demura; Tetsuya Tsujikawa; Hidehiko Okazawa; Takashi Kudoh; Hirohiko Kimura
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2008-04-12       Impact factor: 3.488

9.  The Relationship Between Estrogen Receptor, Progesterone Receptor and Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Expression of Breast Cancer and the Retention Index in Dual Phase (18)F-FDG PET/CT.

Authors:  Hansol Moon; Woo Chul Noh; Hyun-Ah Kim; Eun-Kyu Kim; Ko Woon Park; Seung Sook Lee; Joon Ho Choi; Kyung Woo Han; Byung Hyun Byun; Ilhan Lim; Byung Il Kim; Chang Woon Choi; Sang Moo Lim
Journal:  Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2016-04-11

10.  Integrated FDG-PET/CT does not make invasive staging of the intrathoracic lymph nodes in non-small cell lung cancer redundant: a prospective study.

Authors:  K G Tournoy; S Maddens; R Gosselin; G Van Maele; J P van Meerbeeck; A Kelles
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 9.139

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.