Literature DB >> 10994002

Anosognosia and asomatognosia during intracarotid amobarbital inactivation.

K J Meador1, D W Loring, T E Feinberg, G P Lee, M E Nichols.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Anosognosia (i.e., denial of hemiparesis) and asomatognosia (i.e., inability to recognize the affected limb as one's own) occur more frequently with right cerebral lesions. However, the incidence, relative recovery, and underlying mechanisms remain unclear.
METHODS: Anosognosia and asomatognosia were examined in 62 patients undergoing the intracarotid amobarbital procedure as part of their preoperative evaluation for epilepsy surgery. Additional questions were asked in the last 32 patients studied.
RESULTS: During inactivation of the non-language-dominant cerebral hemisphere, 88% of the 62 patients were unaware of their paralysis, and 82% could not recognize their own hand at some point. Only 3% did not exhibit anosognosia or asomatognosia. In general, asomatognosia resolved earlier than anosognosia. When patients could not recognize their hand, they uniformly thought that it was someone else's hand. Dissociations in awareness were seen in the second series of 32 patients. Although 23 patients (72%) thought that both arms were in the air, 31% pointed to the correct position of the paralyzed arm on the table. Despite the inability of 24 of 32 patients (75%) to recognize their own hand, 21% of these patients were aware that their arm was weak, and 38% had correctly located their paralyzed arm on the angiography table.
CONCLUSIONS: Anosognosia and asomatognosia are both common during acute dysfunction of the non-language-dominant cerebral hemisphere. Dissociations of perception of location, weakness, and ownership of the affected limb are frequent, as are misperceptions of location and body part identity. The dissociations suggest that multiple mechanisms are involved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10994002     DOI: 10.1212/wnl.55.6.816

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurology        ISSN: 0028-3878            Impact factor:   9.910


  9 in total

Review 1.  Mirror self-recognition: a review and critique of attempts to promote and engineer self-recognition in primates.

Authors:  James R Anderson; Gordon G Gallup
Journal:  Primates       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 2.163

2.  Transitory somatoparaphrenia associated with a left frontoparietal meningioma.

Authors:  Rogério Beato; Warley Martins; Arthur Nicolato; Tales Henrique Ulhoa; Marcelo Magaldi Oliveira; Izabela Faria Freitas E Avelar
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2010-02-14       Impact factor: 4.849

3.  The Anatomical and Evolutionary Relationship between Self-awareness and Theory of Mind.

Authors:  Kevin Guise; Karen Kelly; Jennifer Romanowski; Kai Vogeley; Steven M Platek; Elizabeth Murray; Julian Paul Keenan
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2007-06

4.  A neuroanatomical predictor of mirror self-recognition in chimpanzees.

Authors:  E E Hecht; L M Mahovetz; T M Preuss; W D Hopkins
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 5.  Somatoparaphrenia: a body delusion. A review of the neuropsychological literature.

Authors:  Giuseppe Vallar; Roberta Ronchi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Touching a rubber hand: feeling of body ownership is associated with activity in multisensory brain areas.

Authors:  H Henrik Ehrsson; Nicholas P Holmes; Richard E Passingham
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-11-09       Impact factor: 6.709

7.  Negative Emotion Weakens the Degree of Self-Reference Effect: Evidence from ERPs.

Authors:  Wei Fan; Yiping Zhong; Jin Li; Zilu Yang; Youlong Zhan; Ronghua Cai; Xiaolan Fu
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-09-28

8.  Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation Over Ventral Premotor Cortex or Inferior Parietal Lobule Does Not Enhance the Rubber Hand Illusion.

Authors:  Alessandro Mioli; Marco D'Alonzo; Giovanni Pellegrino; Domenico Formica; Giovanni Di Pino
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2018-11-23       Impact factor: 4.677

9.  If I were you: perceptual illusion of body swapping.

Authors:  Valeria I Petkova; H Henrik Ehrsson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-12-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.