PURPOSE: We investigate the potential use of the phytotherapeutic PC-SPES to treat human prostate cancer, and evaluate its in vivo and in vitro activity, and clinical efficacy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: PC-SPES was evaluated for its ability to induce apoptosis on prostate cancer cell lines LNCaP, PC3 and DU145. The effect of oral PC-SPES on growth of PC3 tumors present in male immunodeficient mice was studied. A total of 30 male nude mice were divided in 5 groups. In groups 1 control and 2 full dose therapy was started the same day of the tumor injection. In groups 3 control, 4 half dose and 5 full dose PC-SPES therapy was initiated 1 week after tumor injection. A total of 69 patients with prostate cancer were treated with 3 capsules of 320 mg. PC-SPES daily. Serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) responses and side effects were evaluated. RESULTS: All of the cultured prostate cancer cell lines had a significant dose dependent induction of apoptosis following exposure to an alcoholic PC-SPES extract. Immunodeficient mice xenografted with the PC3 cell line had reduced tumor volume compared with sham treated controls when they were treated with a PC-SPES extract from the time of tumor cell implantation (931 +/- 89 versus 1,424 +/- 685 mm.3, p not significant) but not when the treatment was begun 1 week after tumor cell implantation. The testis, prostate, bladder and seminal vesicles of the treated mice were significantly reduced in weight compared with the sham treated animals. Of the patients with prostate cancer 82% had decreased serum PSA 2 months, 78% 6 months and 88% 12 months after treatment with PC-SPES. Side effects in the treated patient population included nipple tenderness in 42% and phlebitis requiring heparinization in 2%. CONCLUSIONS: An extract of the phytotherapeutic agent PC-SPES proved to be active in inducing apoptosis of hormone sensitive and insensitive prostate cancer cells in vitro, and in suppressing the growth rate of a hormone insensitive prostate cancer cell line in vivo. The overwhelming majority of patients with prostate cancer treated with the agent experienced a decrease in serum PSA but also demonstrated a side effect profile comparable to estrogen treatment.
PURPOSE: We investigate the potential use of the phytotherapeutic PC-SPES to treat humanprostate cancer, and evaluate its in vivo and in vitro activity, and clinical efficacy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: PC-SPES was evaluated for its ability to induce apoptosis on prostate cancer cell lines LNCaP, PC3 and DU145. The effect of oral PC-SPES on growth of PC3 tumors present in male immunodeficientmice was studied. A total of 30 male nude mice were divided in 5 groups. In groups 1 control and 2 full dose therapy was started the same day of the tumor injection. In groups 3 control, 4 half dose and 5 full dose PC-SPES therapy was initiated 1 week after tumor injection. A total of 69 patients with prostate cancer were treated with 3 capsules of 320 mg. PC-SPES daily. Serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) responses and side effects were evaluated. RESULTS: All of the cultured prostate cancer cell lines had a significant dose dependent induction of apoptosis following exposure to an alcoholic PC-SPES extract. Immunodeficientmice xenografted with the PC3 cell line had reduced tumor volume compared with sham treated controls when they were treated with a PC-SPES extract from the time of tumor cell implantation (931 +/- 89 versus 1,424 +/- 685 mm.3, p not significant) but not when the treatment was begun 1 week after tumor cell implantation. The testis, prostate, bladder and seminal vesicles of the treated mice were significantly reduced in weight compared with the sham treated animals. Of the patients with prostate cancer 82% had decreased serum PSA 2 months, 78% 6 months and 88% 12 months after treatment with PC-SPES. Side effects in the treated patient population included nipple tenderness in 42% and phlebitis requiring heparinization in 2%. CONCLUSIONS: An extract of the phytotherapeutic agent PC-SPES proved to be active in inducing apoptosis of hormone sensitive and insensitive prostate cancer cells in vitro, and in suppressing the growth rate of a hormone insensitive prostate cancer cell line in vivo. The overwhelming majority of patients with prostate cancer treated with the agent experienced a decrease in serum PSA but also demonstrated a side effect profile comparable to estrogen treatment.