Literature DB >> 10992254

Neuronal galvanotropism is independent of external Ca(2+) entry or internal Ca(2+) gradients.

A M Palmer1, M A Messerli, K R Robinson.   

Abstract

The mechanism by which growing neurites sense and respond to small applied electrical fields is not known, but there is some evidence that the entry of Ca(2+) from the external medium, with the subsequent formation of intracellular Ca(2+) gradients, is important in this process. We have employed two approaches to test this idea. Xenopus spinal neurites were exposed to electrical fields in a culture medium in which Ca(2+) was chelated to very low levels compared to the normal extracellular concentration of 2 mM. In other experiments, loading the neurites with the calcium buffer, 1, 2-bis(o-aminophenoxy)ethane-N,N,N',N'-tetraacetic acid (BAPTA), disrupted the putative internal Ca(2+) gradients, and the effects on the electrical response were determined. Fields of 100 mV/mm were applied for 12 h, and no difference was detected in the cathodal turning response between the treated neurites and the untreated controls. Using the Differential Growth Index (DGI), an asymmetry index, to quantitate the turning response, we recorded DGIs of -0.64, -0.65, and -0.62 for control cells, cells in Ca(2+)-free medium, and cells preloaded with BAPTA, respectively. Furthermore, we detected an increase in neurite length for those neurons cultured in Ca(2+)-free medium; they were 1.5-1.7 times as long as neurites from neurons cultured in normal Ca(2+) medium. Likewise, we found that BAPTA-loaded neurites were longer than control neurites. Our data indicate that neuronal galvanotropism is independent of the entry of external Ca(2+) or of internal Ca(2+) gradients. Both cell-permeant agonistic and antagonistic analogs of cyclic 3',5'-adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) increased the response to applied electrical fields. Copyright 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10992254     DOI: 10.1002/1097-4695(200010)45:1<30::aid-neu3>3.0.co;2-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurobiol        ISSN: 0022-3034


  8 in total

1.  The embryonic development of Xenopus laevis under a low frequency electric field.

Authors:  Ayper Boga; Secil Binokay; Mustafa Emre; Yasar Sertdemir
Journal:  In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 2.416

Review 2.  Animal models of transcranial direct current stimulation: Methods and mechanisms.

Authors:  Mark P Jackson; Asif Rahman; Belen Lafon; Gregory Kronberg; Doris Ling; Lucas C Parra; Marom Bikson
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-09-10       Impact factor: 3.708

3.  Epidermal keratinocyte polarity and motility require Ca²⁺ influx through TRPV1.

Authors:  David M Graham; Ling Huang; Kenneth R Robinson; Mark A Messerli
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2013-08-13       Impact factor: 5.285

4.  The morphological and molecular changes of brain cells exposed to direct current electric field stimulation.

Authors:  Simon J Pelletier; Marie Lagacé; Isabelle St-Amour; Dany Arsenault; Giulia Cisbani; Audrey Chabrat; Shirley Fecteau; Martin Lévesque; Francesca Cicchetti
Journal:  Int J Neuropsychopharmacol       Date:  2014-12-07       Impact factor: 5.176

Review 5.  Cellular and molecular mechanisms of action of transcranial direct current stimulation: evidence from in vitro and in vivo models.

Authors:  Simon J Pelletier; Francesca Cicchetti
Journal:  Int J Neuropsychopharmacol       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 5.176

6.  Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation to Improve the Dysfunction of Descending Pain Modulatory System Related to Opioids in Chronic Non-cancer Pain: An Integrative Review of Neurobiology and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Maxciel Zortea; Leticia Ramalho; Rael Lopes Alves; Camila Fernanda da Silveira Alves; Gilberto Braulio; Iraci Lucena da Silva Torres; Felipe Fregni; Wolnei Caumo
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2019-11-18       Impact factor: 4.677

Review 7.  Tele-monitored tDCS rehabilitation: feasibility, challenges and future perspectives in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Alberto Cucca; Kush Sharma; Shashank Agarwal; Andrew Seth Feigin; Milton Cesar Biagioni
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 4.262

Review 8.  Direct Current Stimulation in Cell Culture Systems and Brain Slices-New Approaches for Mechanistic Evaluation of Neuronal Plasticity and Neuromodulation: State of the Art.

Authors:  Nadine Euskirchen; Michael A Nitsche; Christoph van Thriel
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2021-12-19       Impact factor: 6.600

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.