P Dorman1, M Dennis, P Sandercock. 1. Department of Neurology, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Queen Victoria Road, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 4LP, UK. pauljdorman@hotmail.com
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Two "simple questions" were developed as a minimalist measurement tool to assess outcome in large trials and epidemiological studies after stroke. A previous study of their validity had disclosed ambiguities in their wording. In this study, the clarity, validity, and reliability of a modified version of these simple questions were examined. The relation between patients' responses to these questions and two widely used generic measures of health related quality of life were also studied. METHODS: A hospital based stroke register cohort of 152 patients, who were all visited at home by a study nurse, was used to study validity. A cohort of 1753 patients derived from the International Stroke Trial was used to study the relation with measures of quality of life. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy with which responses to each question predicted the patients' outcome measured using standard instruments was assessed. The distribution of scores for the EuroQol and SF-36 was examined for patients classified as dependent, independent, and fully recovered by the combined use of the modified simple questions. RESULTS: The modified "dependency" question had excellent sensitivity (>85%), specificity (>79%), and accuracy (>82%) for identifying dependency after stroke. The "problems" question had good sensitivity (65-88%) and moderate specificity (36-72%) for the detection of problems in a broad range of domains. The combined use of the modified dependency and problems questions provided a valid, simple, and reliable overall indicator of health related quality of life after stroke. CONCLUSIONS: The modified simple questions have excellent face validity and good measurement properties for the assessment of outcome after stroke. They are particularly well suited for large epidemiological studies and randomised trials.
OBJECTIVES: Two "simple questions" were developed as a minimalist measurement tool to assess outcome in large trials and epidemiological studies after stroke. A previous study of their validity had disclosed ambiguities in their wording. In this study, the clarity, validity, and reliability of a modified version of these simple questions were examined. The relation between patients' responses to these questions and two widely used generic measures of health related quality of life were also studied. METHODS: A hospital based stroke register cohort of 152 patients, who were all visited at home by a study nurse, was used to study validity. A cohort of 1753 patients derived from the International Stroke Trial was used to study the relation with measures of quality of life. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy with which responses to each question predicted the patients' outcome measured using standard instruments was assessed. The distribution of scores for the EuroQol and SF-36 was examined for patients classified as dependent, independent, and fully recovered by the combined use of the modified simple questions. RESULTS: The modified "dependency" question had excellent sensitivity (>85%), specificity (>79%), and accuracy (>82%) for identifying dependency after stroke. The "problems" question had good sensitivity (65-88%) and moderate specificity (36-72%) for the detection of problems in a broad range of domains. The combined use of the modified dependency and problems questions provided a valid, simple, and reliable overall indicator of health related quality of life after stroke. CONCLUSIONS: The modified simple questions have excellent face validity and good measurement properties for the assessment of outcome after stroke. They are particularly well suited for large epidemiological studies and randomised trials.
Authors: R Kay; K S Wong; Y L Yu; Y W Chan; T H Tsoi; A T Ahuja; F L Chan; K Y Fong; C B Law; A Wong Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1995-12-14 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Xuanqian Xie; Anna Lambrinos; Brian Chan; Irfan A Dhalla; Timo Krings; Leanne K Casaubon; Cheemun Lum; Nancy Sikich; Aditya Bharatha; Vitor Mendes Pereira; Grant Stotts; Gustavo Saposnik; Christina O'Callaghan; Linda Kelloway; Michael D Hill Journal: CMAJ Open Date: 2016-06-16
Authors: Peter Lindgren; Thomas Kahan; Neil Poulter; Martin Buxton; Patrick Svarvar; Björn Dahlöf; Bengt Jonsson Journal: Eur J Health Econ Date: 2007-03
Authors: Dawn Swancutt; Richard Hobbs; David Fitzmaurice; Jonathan Mant; Ellen Murray; Sue Jowett; James Raftery; Stirling Bryan; Michael Davies; Gregory Lip Journal: BMC Cardiovasc Disord Date: 2004-07-29 Impact factor: 2.298