G S Yalavatti1, D DeBacker, J L Vincent. 1. Department of Intensive Care, Erasme University Hospital, Free University of Brussels, Belgium.
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVES: During isovolemic hemodilution, healthy individuals maintain oxygen consumption VO2 by identical increases in cardiac index (CI) and oxygen extraction ratio (O(2)ER). In critically ill patients, the relationship between CI and O(2)ER may be different. Patients with an altered cardiac function may have a decreased CI/O(2)ER ratio, whereas patients with sepsis may have an increased CI/O(2)ER ratio. We hypothesized that the analysis of the CI-O(2)ER relationship could help us to assess the adequacy of cardiac function in critically ill patients with anemia. DESIGN: Prospective, observational study. SETTING: Thirty-one-bed medicosurgical ICU of a university hospital. PATIENTS: Sixty patients equipped with arterial and Swan-Ganz catheters presenting with anemia, which was defined as a hemoglobin level < or = 10 g/dL in the absence of active bleeding. Patients were classified into those with compromised cardiac function (group 1; n = 40), and those with normal cardiac function (group 2; n = 20). MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: In addition to the pertinent clinical data, initial hemodynamic measurements, including pulmonary artery occlusion pressure (PAOP), CI, and O(2)ER, were collected in all patients at the onset of anemia. As anticipated, group 1 patients (n = 40) had lower CIs, higher O(2)ER levels, and lower CI/O(2)ER ratios than group 2 patients. However, there was no significant difference in PAOP values between the groups. The CI/O(2)ER ratio was < 10 in 27 of 40 group 1 patients but only in 4 of 20 group 2 patients. Of these latter four patients, three were found to be hypovolemic, and one patient with sepsis had severe myocardial depression. There was no statistically significant difference in PAOP in group 2 patients with or without hypovolemia ([mean +/- SD] 12.3+/-2.1 mm Hg) vs 13.7+/-4.3 mm Hg; p = 0.21). In group 1, survivors had a higher CI and CI/O(2)ER ratio than nonsurvivors. In group 2, however, such a relationship did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: The relationship between CI and O(2)ER level can help interpret the CI in anemic patients. In anemic patients with no cardiac history, a low CI/O(2)ER ratio (< 10) suggests hypovolemia even when CI is not depressed.
STUDY OBJECTIVES: During isovolemic hemodilution, healthy individuals maintain oxygen consumption VO2 by identical increases in cardiac index (CI) and oxygen extraction ratio (O(2)ER). In critically illpatients, the relationship between CI and O(2)ER may be different. Patients with an altered cardiac function may have a decreased CI/O(2)ER ratio, whereas patients with sepsis may have an increased CI/O(2)ER ratio. We hypothesized that the analysis of the CI-O(2)ER relationship could help us to assess the adequacy of cardiac function in critically illpatients with anemia. DESIGN: Prospective, observational study. SETTING: Thirty-one-bed medicosurgical ICU of a university hospital. PATIENTS: Sixty patients equipped with arterial and Swan-Ganz catheters presenting with anemia, which was defined as a hemoglobin level < or = 10 g/dL in the absence of active bleeding. Patients were classified into those with compromised cardiac function (group 1; n = 40), and those with normal cardiac function (group 2; n = 20). MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: In addition to the pertinent clinical data, initial hemodynamic measurements, including pulmonary artery occlusion pressure (PAOP), CI, and O(2)ER, were collected in all patients at the onset of anemia. As anticipated, group 1 patients (n = 40) had lower CIs, higher O(2)ER levels, and lower CI/O(2)ER ratios than group 2 patients. However, there was no significant difference in PAOP values between the groups. The CI/O(2)ER ratio was < 10 in 27 of 40 group 1 patients but only in 4 of 20 group 2 patients. Of these latter four patients, three were found to be hypovolemic, and one patient with sepsis had severe myocardial depression. There was no statistically significant difference in PAOP in group 2 patients with or without hypovolemia ([mean +/- SD] 12.3+/-2.1 mm Hg) vs 13.7+/-4.3 mm Hg; p = 0.21). In group 1, survivors had a higher CI and CI/O(2)ER ratio than nonsurvivors. In group 2, however, such a relationship did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: The relationship between CI and O(2)ER level can help interpret the CI in anemicpatients. In anemicpatients with no cardiac history, a low CI/O(2)ER ratio (< 10) suggests hypovolemia even when CI is not depressed.