X Garcia-Moll1, E Zouridakis, D Cole, J C Kaski. 1. Coronary Artery Disease Research Unit, Cardiological Sciences, St. George's Hospital Medical School, London, U.K.
Abstract
AIMS: Serum C-reactive protein has prognostic significance in apparently healthy men and women and in men with coronary artery disease. Little is known regarding the predictive role of C-reactive protein in women with coronary heart disease. We assessed whether differences exist in C-reactive protein levels and their prognostic value in men compared with women. We also assessed whether C-reactive protein concentrations differed in women receiving hormone replacement therapy vs those on no hormone replacement therapy. METHODS AND RESULTS: We prospectively studied 911 consecutive patients (327 women) with typical exertional angina. All patients underwent clinical, biochemical and angiographic characterization at study entry. Serum C-reactive protein was measured using a highly sensitive assay and correlated with clinical events during follow-up (from 1.0 to 3.7 years). C-reactive protein was significantly higher in women than men (3.0 mg. l(-1)[range 1.3-5.8] vs 2.1 mg. l(-1)[range 1.0-4.2], P<0.001), even after multiple regression adjustment for other risk factors. C-reactive protein was also significantly higher in women receiving hormone replacement therapy than in women not using hormone replacement therapy (P=0.001). C-reactive protein was an independent predictor of cardiovascular risk (logistic regression P=0.033) in the whole group but, despite higher C-reactive protein concentration, women had a similar rate of cardiac events compared to men. CONCLUSIONS: Baseline C-reactive protein levels were higher in women than men but the event rate was similar in men and women. Women on hormone replacement therapy had significantly higher C-reactive protein than women not using hormone replacement therapy. In the group as a whole, increased C-reactive protein was associated with a higher cardiovascular risk. Copyright 2000 The European Society of Cardiology.
AIMS: Serum C-reactive protein has prognostic significance in apparently healthy men and women and in men with coronary artery disease. Little is known regarding the predictive role of C-reactive protein in women with coronary heart disease. We assessed whether differences exist in C-reactive protein levels and their prognostic value in men compared with women. We also assessed whether C-reactive protein concentrations differed in women receiving hormone replacement therapy vs those on no hormone replacement therapy. METHODS AND RESULTS: We prospectively studied 911 consecutive patients (327 women) with typical exertional angina. All patients underwent clinical, biochemical and angiographic characterization at study entry. Serum C-reactive protein was measured using a highly sensitive assay and correlated with clinical events during follow-up (from 1.0 to 3.7 years). C-reactive protein was significantly higher in women than men (3.0 mg. l(-1)[range 1.3-5.8] vs 2.1 mg. l(-1)[range 1.0-4.2], P<0.001), even after multiple regression adjustment for other risk factors. C-reactive protein was also significantly higher in women receiving hormone replacement therapy than in women not using hormone replacement therapy (P=0.001). C-reactive protein was an independent predictor of cardiovascular risk (logistic regression P=0.033) in the whole group but, despite higher C-reactive protein concentration, women had a similar rate of cardiac events compared to men. CONCLUSIONS: Baseline C-reactive protein levels were higher in women than men but the event rate was similar in men and women. Women on hormone replacement therapy had significantly higher C-reactive protein than women not using hormone replacement therapy. In the group as a whole, increased C-reactive protein was associated with a higher cardiovascular risk. Copyright 2000 The European Society of Cardiology.
Authors: Emily S Lau; Aleksandra Binek; Sarah J Parker; Svati H Shah; Markella V Zanni; Jennifer E Van Eyk; Jennifer E Ho Journal: Circ Res Date: 2022-02-17 Impact factor: 23.213
Authors: Alois Suessenbacher; Maria Wanitschek; Jakob Dörler; Sabrina Neururer; Matthias Frick; Otmar Pachinger; Hannes F W Alber Journal: Wien Klin Wochenschr Date: 2014-09-13 Impact factor: 1.704
Authors: Crystel M Gijsberts; Hester M den Ruijter; Dominique P V de Kleijn; Albert Huisman; Maarten J Ten Berg; Richard H A van Wijk; Folkert W Asselbergs; Michiel Voskuil; Gerard Pasterkamp; Wouter W van Solinge; Imo E Hoefer Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Date: 2015-11 Impact factor: 1.817