Literature DB >> 10986787

Quality of breast cancer sites on the World Wide Web.

L Hoffman-Goetz1, J N Clarke.   

Abstract

The Internet is a powerful tool for accessing information about complex health topics. The purpose of this study was to evaluate breast cancer Internet sites using published criteria about website structure. Two searches were undertaken (November 1998 and June 1999) using the Yahoo search engine, providing a sample of 136 unique addresses. The results showed 1) owner's credentials were identified in 31.6% of sites, 2) financial charges were stated in 10.3% of sites, 3) less than 14.0% identified site creation date, 4) 33.1% identified content posting update, 5) 30.1% identified information sources, and 6) just under 88% of sites provided e-mail interactivity. The results indicate variability in breast cancer Internet sites with respect to framework criteria of accountability. We suggest that websites that lack fundamental indicators (such as dating and sources) do not provide the user with fundamental information that could enable informed decision making about site quality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10986787      PMCID: PMC6979993     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Public Health        ISSN: 0008-4263


  19 in total

1.  Hailed as a Surgeon General, Koop criticized on web ethics.

Authors:  Holcomb B Noble
Journal:  N Y Times Web       Date:  1999-09-05

2.  Medical information on the Internet: a study of an electronic bulletin board.

Authors:  J D Culver; F Gerr; H Frumkin
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Here come patients who've "studied" medicine on-line.

Authors:  R L Lowes
Journal:  Med Econ       Date:  1997-01-27

4.  Information epidemics, economics, and immunity on the internet. We still know so little about the effect of information on public health.

Authors:  E Coiera
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-11-28

Review 5.  Towards quality management of medical information on the internet: evaluation, labelling, and filtering of information.

Authors:  G Eysenbach; T L Diepgen
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-11-28

6.  Internet accelerates spread of bogus cancer cure.

Authors:  M Larkin
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1999-01-23       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Commentary: measuring quality and impact of the World Wide Web.

Authors:  J C Wyatt
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1997-06-28

8.  Quality of medical information on the Internet.

Authors:  J Mack
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1997-08-27       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Assessing, controlling, and assuring the quality of medical information on the Internet: Caveant lector et viewor--Let the reader and viewer beware.

Authors:  W M Silberg; G D Lundberg; R A Musacchio
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1997-04-16       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Turning an info-glut into a library.

Authors:  R Pool
Journal:  Science       Date:  1994-10-07       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  23 in total

1.  Cancer information on the world wide Web: gross characteristics.

Authors:  Craig W Trumbo
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2004-02-18       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Tangled in the breast cancer web: an evaluation of the usage of web-based information resources by breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Sonia Kim Anh Nguyen; Paris-Ann Ingledew
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 3.  Online communities for breast cancer survivors: a review and analysis of their characteristics and levels of use.

Authors:  Jacqueline L Bender; M Carolina Jimenez-Marroquin; Lorraine E Ferris; Joel Katz; Alejandro R Jadad
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2012-11-23       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Communication Assessment of the Most Frequented Breast Cancer Websites: Evaluation of Design and Theoretical Criteria.

Authors:  Pamela Whitten; Sandi Smith; Samantha Munday; Carolyn LaPlante
Journal:  J Comput Mediat Commun       Date:  2008-09-08

5.  Breast cancer on the world wide web: cross sectional survey of quality of information and popularity of websites.

Authors:  Funda Meric; Elmer V Bernstam; Nadeem Q Mirza; Kelly K Hunt; Frederick C Ames; Merrick I Ross; Henry M Kuerer; Raphael E Pollock; Mark A Musen; S Eva Singletary
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-03-09

6.  Psychosocial determinants of cancer-related information seeking among cancer patients.

Authors:  Aaron Smith-McLallen; Martin Fishbein; Robert C Hornik
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2011-02

7.  Effects of a web-based intervention on women's breast health behaviors.

Authors:  Deborah J Bowen; Robert Robbins; Nigel Bush; Hendrika Meischke; Abi Ludwig; Jean Wooldridge
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 3.046

8.  Effects of a Web-based intervention on women's breast health behaviors.

Authors:  Deborah J Bowen; Robert Robbins; Nigel Bush; Hendrika Meischke; Abi Ludwig; Jean Wooldridge
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.046

9.  MRI of the breast: does the internet accurately report its beneficial uses and limitations?

Authors:  Larissa Nekhlyudov; Keith Kiarsis; Joann G Elmore
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2009 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.431

10.  Information and communication technology (ICT) in oncology. Patients' and relatives' experiences and suggestions.

Authors:  Jan Norum; Anne Grev; Mari-Ann Moen; Lise Balteskard; Kari Holthe
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2003-03-27       Impact factor: 3.603

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.