Literature DB >> 10986763

[Laparoscopic splenectomy for hematologic diseases. Study of 275 cases. French Society of Laparoscopic Surgery].

B Delaitre1, G Champault, C Barrat, D Gossot, L Bresler, C Meyer, D Collet, G Samama.   

Abstract

AIM OF THE STUDY: To evaluate the results of laparoscopic splenectomy for hematologic diseases by a multicenter retrospective study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1991 and 1998, 275 patients (mean age: 40.4 years [18-93]) underwent splenectomy for idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) (n = 209, 76%), for hemolytic anemia (HA) (n = 37) including hereditary spherocytosis (n = 13) and auto-immune anemia (n = 24), lymphoma (n = 12), tumor (n = 6) and uncommon hematologic syndromes (n = 11). Laparoscopic splenectomy was attempted in every patient. The lateral approach was most commonly used with an anterior approach to the splenic hilar vessels, which were cut after hemostasis using a stapling gun; other techniques were also employed.
RESULTS: The mean operating time was 165 minutes (45-360); it was shorter in the case of conversion (144 minutes) and became shorter with the operator's experience. Conversion was necessary in 55 patients (20%), due to hemorrhage in 2/3 of cases, related to splenic vessels (20 cases), short gastric vessels (9 cases), or injury of the spleen (8 cases). In ten cases (2%), conversion was necessary for extraction of the spleen. Conversion rate varied from 5.3 to 46.7%, depending on the surgical team. Univariate analysis of factors predisposing to conversion identified four causes: obesity; technique used to achieve hemostasis of the splenic hilar vessels; operator's experience; and presence of splenomegaly. An accessory spleen was found in 44 patients (16%). The weight of the spleen was more than 350 g in 43 patients (15.6%). There were no deaths. There were no significant complications in 236 patients (85.8%) and the mean hospital stay was 6.4 days. In comparison with patients who had a conversion, bowel function returned significantly earlier, use of analgesia was reduced and hospital stay was shorter. The overall morbidity rate was 13.8% (n = 38); morbidity rate was only 10.4% (n = 22) for laparoscopic splenectomy. In these 22 patients, the complications were: subphrenic collections (n = 5, 2.2%), abdominal wall infections (n = 5), thromboembolic events (n = 2), anemia (n = 2), pneumonia (n = 1), peptic ulcer (n = 1), bowel obstruction (n = 1), splenic vein thrombosis (n = 1). Re-operations were required in 4 patients (1.8%) because of hemorrhage, pancreatitis and bowel obstruction. Morbidity rate was significantly increased in the case of conversion (27%), obesity (20%), malignant disease (30%) and splenomegaly (21.8%). Forty-four patients (16%) received perioperative or postoperative blood transfusion and 23 (8.3%) received platelet transfusion. Mean time to return to normal activity was 21 days and was shorter in the absence of conversion (18.5 days versus 35 days). In patients with ITP, the mean platelet count was 240,000 after 3 months, and the failure rate was 8.3%.
CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic splenectomy is a real alternative to conventional splenectomy for some hematologic diseases, particularly ITP and HA. The advantages are an uneventful postoperative course, a lower morbidity rate, a shorter hospital stay and an earlier return to normal activity. The limits of this technique are related to the operator's experience, the size of the spleen, the nature of the underlying disorders and patient characteristics, mainly obesity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10986763     DOI: 10.1016/s0003-3944(00)00236-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Chir        ISSN: 0003-3944


  14 in total

1.  Single-incision laparoscopic splenectomy using the "tug-exposure technique" in adults: results of ten initial cases.

Authors:  Takeyuki Misawa; Taro Sakamoto; Ryusuke Ito; Hiroaki Shiba; Takeshi Gocho; Shigeki Wakiyama; Yuichi Ishida; Katsuhiko Yanaga
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-04-22       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  The Role of Pre-emptive Control of Vascular Pedicle in Laparoscopic Splenectomy: An Experience with 19 Consecutive Patients.

Authors:  Vishwanath Golash
Journal:  Oman Med J       Date:  2011-03

3.  Sutureless and stapleless laparoscopic splenectomy using radiofrequency: LigaSure device.

Authors:  R Gelmini; F Romano; N Quaranta; R Caprotti; G Tazzioli; G Colombo; M Saviano; F Uggeri
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-05-11       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  [Adult autoimmune thrombocytopenia: diagnosis and treatment].

Authors:  Klaus Lechner; Ansgar Weltermann; Ingrid Pabinger
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 1.704

5.  Pancreaticopleural Fistula After Cytoreductive Surgery and HIPEC for Pseudomyxoma Peritonei-a Rare Presentation and Rare Complication.

Authors:  Snita Sinukumar; Shailesh Naik; Devarthi Khurjekar; Yadav Munde; Sameer Bhosale
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-06-26

6.  Early prophylactic anticoagulation for portal vein system thrombosis after splenectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ning Zhang; Yingmin Yao; Wanli Xue; Shengli Wu
Journal:  Biomed Rep       Date:  2016-09-09

7.  Perioperative spleen embolization as a useful tool in laparoscopic splenectomy for simple and massive splenomegaly in children: a prospective study.

Authors:  E Van Der Veken; M Laureys; G Rodesch; H Steyaert
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Thrombosis of the splenoportal axis after splenectomy.

Authors:  Fabrizio Romano; Roberto Caprotti; Matteo Conti; Maria Gaia Piacentini; Fabio Uggeri; Vittorio Motta; Enrico Maria Pogliani; Franco Uggeri
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2006-08-15       Impact factor: 3.445

9.  Laparoscopic splenectomy: the latest technical evaluation.

Authors:  Min Tan; Chao-Xu Zheng; Zhi-Mian Wu; Guo-Tai Chen; Liu-Hua Chen; Zhen-Xian Zhao
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Laparoscopic surgery of the spleen through single umbilical incision.

Authors:  Michał Pędziwiatr; Maciej Matłok; Piotr Major; Daria Kuliś; Andrzej Budzyński
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2012-09-29       Impact factor: 1.195

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.