Literature DB >> 10986057

Phase I-II study of paclitaxel, cisplatin, and gemcitabine in advanced transitional-cell carcinoma of the urothelium. Spanish Oncology Genitourinary Group.

J Bellmunt1, V Guillem, L Paz-Ares, J L González-Larriba, J Carles, E Batiste-Alentorn, A Sáenz, M López-Brea, A Font, M Nogué, R Bastús, M A Climent, J J de la Cruz, J Albanell, J M Banús, E Gallardo, E Diaz-Rubio, H Cortés-Funes, J Baselga.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum-tolerated dose and the antitumor activity of a combination of paclitaxel, cisplatin, and gemcitabine in advanced transitional-cell carcinoma (TCC) of the urothelium. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with measurable, previously untreated, locally advanced or metastatic TCC and with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status < or = 2 and creatinine clearance > or = 55 mL/min were eligible. Cisplatin was given on day 1 at a fixed dose of 70 mg/m(2). Paclitaxel and gemcitabine were given on days 1 and 8 at increasing dose levels. Cycles were repeated every 21 days to a maximum of six cycles.
RESULTS: Sixty-one patients were registered. In phase I, 15 patients were entered at four different dose levels. Dose-limiting toxicity consisted of early onset (after the first cycle) grade 2 asthenia (two of six patients) and grade 3 asthenia (one of six patients) at dose level 4. A paclitaxel dose of 80 mg/m(2) and gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) was recommended for phase II, and 46 additional patients were entered at this level for a total of 49 patients. Main nonhematologic toxicity was grade 2 asthenia in 18 patients, with early onset in five patients, and grade 3 in four patients. Grade 3/4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 27 (55%) and 11 (22%) patients, respectively. Overall, febrile neutropenia was seen in 11 patients, and one toxic death occurred because of neutropenic sepsis. The combination was active at all dose levels. In total, 58 of 61 eligible patients were assessable for response; 16 complete responses (27.6%) and 29 partial responses (50%) were observed for an overall response rate of 77.6% (95% confidence interval, 60% to 98%). The median survival time (MST) available for the phase I part of the study is 24.0 months. MST has not been reached for the whole group with the current follow-up.
CONCLUSION: This combination of paclitaxel, cisplatin, and gemcitabine is feasible and highly active in patients with advanced TCC of the urothelium. Further evaluation of this regimen in patients with TCC is warranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10986057     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2000.18.18.3247

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  18 in total

Review 1.  [Value of systemic chemotherapy in bladder cancer].

Authors:  P J Goebell; F vom Dorp; H Rübben
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  Randomized phase III study comparing paclitaxel/cisplatin/gemcitabine and gemcitabine/cisplatin in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer without prior systemic therapy: EORTC Intergroup Study 30987.

Authors:  Joaquim Bellmunt; Hans von der Maase; Graham M Mead; Iwona Skoneczna; Maria De Santis; Gedske Daugaard; Andreas Boehle; Christine Chevreau; Luis Paz-Ares; Leslie R Laufman; Eric Winquist; Derek Raghavan; Sandrine Marreaud; Sandra Collette; Richard Sylvester; Ronald de Wit
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-02-27       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 3.  Current chemotherapeutic strategies against bladder cancer.

Authors:  Yozo Mitsui; Hiroaki Yasumoto; Naoko Arichi; Satoshi Honda; Hiroaki Shiina; Mikio Igawa
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2011-06-12       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 4.  State-of-the-art management of metastatic disease at initial presentation or recurrence.

Authors:  Fabio Calabrò; Cora N Sternberg
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 5.  Novel strategies for treating relapsed/refractory urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Gopa Iyer; Matthew I Milowsky; Dean F Bajorin
Journal:  Expert Rev Anticancer Ther       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.512

6.  First- and second-line therapy for metastatic urothelial carcinoma of the bladder.

Authors:  F A Yafi; S North; W Kassouf
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 7.  Management of bladder cancer: current and emerging strategies.

Authors:  Neeraj Agarwal; Maha Hussain
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2009-06-18       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 8.  Multimodal management of muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  Jong Chul Park; Deborah E Citrin; Piyush K Agarwal; Andrea B Apolo
Journal:  Curr Probl Cancer       Date:  2014-06-23       Impact factor: 3.187

9.  Phase I study of a 3-drug regimen of gemcitabine/cisplatin/pemetrexed in patients with metastatic transitional cell carcinoma of the urothelium.

Authors:  Thomas E Hutson; Svetislava Vukelja; Daniel Atienza; Sanjay Awasthi; Robert Delaune; Margaret Deutsch; Philip Y Dien; Thomas F Gregory; Michael J Kolodziej; Joseph J Muscato; Robert N Raju; Robert L Ruxer; Stephanie Mull; Des Ilegbodu; Karen Hood; Steven Nicol; William Berry
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2008-01-31       Impact factor: 3.850

Review 10.  Chemotherapy for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer.

Authors:  Patrizia Trenta; Fabio Calabrò; Linda Cerbone; Cora N Sternberg
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2016-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.