Literature DB >> 10985658

Comparative performance of PCR-based assay versus microscopy and culture for the direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in clinical respiratory specimens in Lebanon.

G F Araj1, R S Talhouk, L Y Itani, W Jaber, G W Jamaleddine.   

Abstract

SETTING: American University of Beirut Medical Center, Lebanon.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the performance of a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using primers that flank 542 bp within IS6110 in Mycobacterium tuberculosis (TB) vs. microscopy and BACTEC culture, in the diagnosis of tuberculosis.
DESIGN: A total of 82 clinical respiratory pulmonary specimens and 73 samples from BACTEC vials were tested by the three methods.
RESULTS: Of 24 smear-positive culture-positive (SP-CP) and 11 smear-negative culture-positive (SN-CP) TB specimens, PCR detected 83% and 64%, respectively. Among 17 specimens yielding mycobacteria other than tuberculosis (MOTT), the PCR was positive in 33% SP-CP and 14% SN-CP specimens. Among the 73 BACTEC vials, PCR was positive in 36 of 38 (95%) yielding culture-positive TB, and in one of 20 (5%) yielding culture positive MOTT. None of the 30 smear-negative culture-negative (SN-CN) clinical specimens and 15 of the CN vials were positive by PCR. The overall sensitivity of PCR was 77% and 95% for TB detection in respiratory specimens and BACTEC vials, respectively, and the specificity was 94% in both.
CONCLUSIONS: Because a substantial number of TB cases are missed, especially in SN-CP specimens, a PCR-based assay utilizing these primers cannot be used reliably, alone, in clinical laboratory diagnosis of mycobacterial respiratory infections.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10985658

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Tuberc Lung Dis        ISSN: 1027-3719            Impact factor:   2.373


  5 in total

1.  Diagnostic accuracy of in-house PCR for pulmonary tuberculosis in smear-positive patients: meta-analysis and metaregression.

Authors:  S Greco; M Rulli; E Girardi; C Piersimoni; C Saltini
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2009-01-14       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Assessment by meta-analysis of PCR for diagnosis of smear-negative pulmonary tuberculosis.

Authors:  Olga L Sarmiento; Kristen A Weigle; Janet Alexander; David J Weber; William C Miller
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Comparison of two laboratory-developed PCR methods for the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis in Brazilian patients with and without HIV infection.

Authors:  Luciene C Scherer; Rosa D Sperhacke; Carla Jarczewski; Patrícia I Cafrune; Candice T Michelon; Rubia Rupenthal; Marta Osorio Ribeiro; Antonio Ruffino Netto; Maria L R Rossetti; Afrânio L Kritski
Journal:  BMC Pulm Med       Date:  2011-03-29       Impact factor: 3.317

4.  The effectiveness of real-time PCR assay, compared with microbiologic results for the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis.

Authors:  Seo Woo Kim; Sae In Kim; Seok Jeong Lee; Jin Hwa Lee; Yun Ju Ryu; Sung Shine Shim; Yookyoung Kim; Mi Ae Lee; Jung Hyun Chang
Journal:  Tuberc Respir Dis (Seoul)       Date:  2015-01-29

5.  The Impact of a Knowledge Discovery-Based Psychoanalytic Intervention in the Treatment of Tuberculosis in University Students with Different Doses of Isoniazid.

Authors:  Zhihui Xia; Youping Tan; Yumei Yang
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 2.682

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.