Literature DB >> 10985231

Unit-treatment interaction and its practical consequences.

G L Gadbury1, H K Iyer.   

Abstract

Most statistical characterizations of a treatment effect focus on the average effect of the treatment over an entire population. However, average effects may provide inadequate information, sometimes misleading information, when a substantial unit-treatment interaction is present in the population. It is even possible that a nonnegligible proportion of the individuals in the population experience an unfavorable treatment effect even though the treatment might appear to be beneficial when considering population averages. This paper examines the extent to which information about unit-treatment interaction can be extracted using observed data from a two-treatment completely randomized experiment. A method for utilizing the information from an available covariate is proposed. Although unit-treatment interaction is a nonidentifiable quantity, we show that mathematical bounds for it can be estimated from observed data. These bounds lead to estimated bounds for the probability of an unfavorable treatment effect. Maximum likelihood estimators of the bounds and their corresponding large-sample distributions are given. The use of the estimated bounds is illustrated in a clinical trials data example.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10985231     DOI: 10.1111/j.0006-341x.2000.00882.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  6 in total

1.  Cause-effect relationships in analytical surveys: an illustration of statistical issues.

Authors:  Gary L Gadbury; Hans T Schreuder
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Application of potential outcomes to an intentional weight loss latent variable problem.

Authors:  Gary L Gadbury; Thidaporn Supapakorn; Christopher S Coffey; Scott W Keith; David B Allison
Journal:  Stat Interface       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 0.582

3.  Assessing the heterogeneity of treatment effects via potential outcomes of individual patients.

Authors:  Zhiwei Zhang; Chenguang Wang; Lei Nie; Guoxing Soon
Journal:  J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 1.864

4.  Treatment Heterogeneity and Individual Qualitative Interaction.

Authors:  Robert S Poulson; Gary L Gadbury; David B Allison
Journal:  Am Stat       Date:  2012-06-12       Impact factor: 8.710

5.  Treatment benefit and treatment harm rate to characterize heterogeneity in treatment effect.

Authors:  Changyu Shen; Jaesik Jeong; Xiaochun Li; Peng-Sheng Chen; Alfred Buxton
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2013-07-19       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  The Use of Covariates and Random Effects in Evaluating Predictive Biomarkers Under a Potential Outcome Framework.

Authors:  Zhiwei Zhang; Lei Nie; Guoxing Soon; Aiyi Liu
Journal:  Ann Appl Stat       Date:  2014-12-19       Impact factor: 2.083

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.