| Literature DB >> 10984942 |
Y Fukuba1, K Hara, Y Kimura, A Takahashi, S A Ward, B J Whipp.
Abstract
A new exercise protocol has been proposed, with respect to cardiopulmonary exercise testing, which starts at a low work rate (WR) and increases exponentially by a standard percentage of the previous work rate every minute: the test is termed STEEP (standardised exponential exercise protocol). The potential advantage of this protocol is that it can accommodate a wide range of subjects, since it allows a maximum to be attained with a relatively narrow variation of tolerance time, regardless of subjects exercise capacity. To date, only the VO2max has been compared with that from the current standard ramp protocol. The ramp, however, also allows other important parameters of aerobic function to be estimated: the anaerobic threshold (AT); the response time constant; and delta VO2/delta WR. The aim of this study was, therefore, to clarify whether these aerobic parameters can be readily discerned from the responses to the STEEP protocol both from a theoretical and practical viewpoint. As a result of theoretical considerations, we demonstrated that the VO2 time constant and delta VO2/delta WR may not both be estimated uniquely. As a practical expedient, a procedure was proposed for estimating the parameter analogues. The preliminary results for six subjects between the STEEP and ramp protocols showed consistent positive correlation for VO2max (r = 0.997) and AT-VO2 (r = 0.980), whereas the correlation for the VO2 time constant and delta VO2/delta WR were not significant. Further study is needed to clarify the reason(s) for the discrepancies both from a theoretical and practical viewpoint.Mesh:
Year: 2000 PMID: 10984942 DOI: 10.1007/BF02345013
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Med Biol Eng Comput ISSN: 0140-0118 Impact factor: 2.602