Literature DB >> 10984797

Analysis of titanium mesh cages in adults with minimum two-year follow-up.

K R Eck1, K H Bridwell, F F Ungacta, M A Lapp, L G Lenke, K D Riew.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: This is a study of 66 consecutive adult patients (ages 20-81 years) with sagittal deformities who underwent surgery in which structural titanium mesh cages were implanted into the anterior column during posterior instrumentation and fusion. Follow-up ranged from 24 to 62 months (mean, 33 months).
OBJECTIVES: To assess the complications and outcomes of patients with structural cages implanted into the anterior column. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Structural cages for the anterior column are popular in the treatment of adult spinal disorders. Few studies to determine their efficacy have a minimum 2-year follow-up.
METHODS: Sixty-six patients with minimum 2-year follow-up were analyzed for cage, spinal fusion, and instrumentation status. Outcomes were assessed by analysis of responses to questionnaires administered to the patients at latest follow-up.
RESULTS: No cage failure or extrusion was observed. The average segmental improvement in lordosis with cage implantation was 11 degrees with a loss of correction of less than 1 degrees at latest follow-up. The readability of plain radiographs for assessment of anterior fusions was better than for posterior fusions. The agreement level for judging spines to be fused was two of three for 78% of the anterior levels and 47% of the posterior levels. The remaining posterior fusion levels were unassessable. No statistical difference was found in outcome between the group of patients with suspected nonfused anterior levels and the group with all levels fused.
CONCLUSIONS: Structural titanium mesh cages implanted into the anterior column function appropriately to maintain sagittal correction, with rare radiographic complications. Seventy-eight percent of the anterior levels were judged to be fused by observers examining plain radiographs. The outcome at latest follow-up for patients with suspected nonfused anterior levels was similar to that in the group of patients with fusions rated solid at every level.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10984797     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200009150-00023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  36 in total

1.  Biomechanical and clinical study of single posterior oblique cage POLIF in the treatment of degenerative diseases of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  Antonino Zagra; Laura Scaramuzzo; Fabio Galbusera; Leone Minoia; Marino Archetti; Fabrizio Giudici
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Anatomy-related risk factors for the subsidence of titanium mesh cage in cervical reconstruction after one-level corpectomy.

Authors:  Jianxin Wu; Dan Luo; Xiaojian Ye; Xuyao Luo; Lisheng Yan; Haiping Qian
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-05-15

3.  [Effects of a new anatomical adaptive titanium mesh cage on supportive load at the cervical endplate: a morphological and biomechanical study].

Authors:  Teng Lu; Zhongyang Gao; Xijing He; Jialiang Li; Ning Liu; Hui Liang; Yibin Wang; Zhijing Wen; Ting Zhang; Dong Wang; Haopeng Li
Journal:  Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao       Date:  2019-04-30

4.  The influence of cage positioning and cage type on cage migration and fusion rates in patients with monosegmental posterior lumbar interbody fusion and posterior fixation.

Authors:  Alexander Abbushi; Mario Cabraja; Ulrich-Wilhelm Thomale; Christian Woiciechowsky; Stefan Nikolaus Kroppenstedt
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-05-28       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Comparison of anterior cervical fusion by titanium mesh cage versus nano-hydroxyapatite/polyamide cage following single-level corpectomy.

Authors:  Xi Yang; Qi Chen; Limin Liu; Yueming Song; Qingquan Kong; Jiancheng Zeng; Youdi Xue; Chunpeng Ren
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-09-22       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Lumbar interbody fusion: a parametric investigation of a novel cage design with and without posterior instrumentation.

Authors:  Fabio Galbusera; Hendrik Schmidt; Hans-Joachim Wilke
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-09-15       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Long-term effects of placing one or two cages in instrumented posterior lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Mingzheng Zhang; Fang Pu; Liqiang Xu; Linlin Zhang; Jie Yao; Deyu Li; Yu Wang; Yubo Fan
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Augmentation improves human cadaveric vertebral body compression mechanics for lumbar total disc replacement.

Authors:  Jonathon H Yoder; Joshua D Auerbach; Philip M Maurer; Erik M Erbe; Dean Entrekin; Richard A Balderston; Rudolf Bertagnoli; Dawn M Elliott
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2010-04-20       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Comparison of plain radiographs with CT scan to evaluate interbody fusion following the use of titanium interbody cages and transpedicular instrumentation.

Authors:  Rajesh R Shah; Saeed Mohammed; Asif Saifuddin; Benjamin A Taylor
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2003-05-07       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Harms titanium mesh cage fracture.

Authors:  Zdenek Klezl; Carlos A Bagley; Markus J Bookland; Jean-Paul Wolinsky; Zdenek Rezek; Ziya L Gokaslan
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-05-12       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.