Literature DB >> 10984564

Trial of a supplemental dose of four poliovirus vaccines.

R W Sutter1, A J Suleiman, P Malankar, S Al-Khusaiby, F Mehta, G B Clements, M A Pallansch, S E Robertson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The immunogenicity of oral poliovirus vaccine (OPV), particularly the type 3 component, is lower in infants in most developing countries than in infants in industrialized countries. We conducted a multicenter trial in Oman to evaluate the response to a supplemental dose of four poliovirus vaccine formulations.
METHODS: At nine months of age, infants were randomly assigned to receive inactivated-poliovirus vaccine (IPV), administered subcutaneously; trivalent OPV manufactured in the United States or in Europe; or monovalent type 3 OPV. Serum samples were collected at enrollment and 7 and 30 days later. All of the infants had previously received five doses of OPV.
RESULTS: We enrolled 1025 infants; 785 (76.6 percent) met all the study requirements. At enrollment, 96.8 percent of the infants were seropositive for poliovirus type 1, 98.0 percent for type 2, and 88.0 percent for type 3. At 30 days there were no significant increases in type 3 seroprevalence or in the median antibody titer in the groups of infants who received OPV. Among the recipients of IPV, type 3 seroprevalence increased from 87.8 percent at enrollment to 97.1 percent at 30 days (P<0.001), and the median antibody titer increased from 1:228 to 1:1448 or higher (P<0.001). The rapid initial increase in the antibody titer suggests a secondary immune response.
CONCLUSIONS: A supplemental dose of IPV has excellent immunogenicity and leads to increases in the titer of antibodies against type 3 poliovirus, whereas supplemental doses of the oral vaccines do not have these effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10984564     DOI: 10.1056/NEJM200009143431103

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  15 in total

1.  Comparison of the Immunogenicity of Various Booster Doses of Inactivated Polio Vaccine Delivered Intradermally Versus Intramuscularly to HIV-Infected Adults.

Authors:  Stephanie B Troy; Diana Kouiavskaia; Julia Siik; Efrat Kochba; Hind Beydoun; Olga Mirochnitchenko; Yotam Levin; Nancy Khardori; Konstantin Chumakov; Yvonne Maldonado
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 5.226

2.  Successes and shortcomings of polio eradication: a transmission modeling analysis.

Authors:  Bryan T Mayer; Joseph N S Eisenberg; Christopher J Henry; M Gabriela M Gomes; Edward L Ionides; James S Koopman
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 3.  Clearing Vaccine-Derived Poliovirus Infection Following Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: a Case Report and Review of Literature.

Authors:  Mohammadreza Shaghaghi; Mona Irannejad; Hassan Abolhassani; Shohreh Shahmahmoodi; Amir Ali Hamidieh; Saeed Soleyman-Jahi; Reza Yazdani; Gholamreza Azizi; Asghar Aghamohammadi
Journal:  J Clin Immunol       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 8.317

4.  Achieving high immunogenicity against poliovirus with fractional doses of inactivated poliovirus vaccine in Ecuador-results from a cross-sectional serological survey.

Authors:  Gabriel Trueba; Vishali Jeyaseelan; Lazaro Lopez; Bernardo A Mainou; Yiting Zhang; Alvaro Whittembury; Alfredo Jose Olmedo Valarezo; Gonzalo Baquero; Rosa Romero de Aguinaga; Lucia Jeannete Zurita Salinas; Maria Gabriela Santacruz Mancheno; Diana Elizabeth Medina Chacho; Emmanuelle Quentin; Ana Elena Chevez; Gloria Rey-Benito; Ondrej Mach
Journal:  Lancet Reg Health Am       Date:  2022-07

5.  Seroprevalence and vaccination coverage of vaccine-preventable diseases in perinatally HIV-1-infected patients.

Authors:  Laura Sticchi; Bianca Bruzzone; Patrizia Caligiuri; Emanuela Rappazzo; Michele Lo Casto; Laura De Hoffer; Giulia Gustinetti; Claudio Viscoli; Antonio Di Biagio
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 6.  Systematic review of mucosal immunity induced by oral and inactivated poliovirus vaccines against virus shedding following oral poliovirus challenge.

Authors:  Thomas R Hird; Nicholas C Grassly
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2012-04-19       Impact factor: 6.823

7.  Estimating the risk of re-emergence after stopping polio vaccination.

Authors:  Akira Sasaki; Yoshihiro Haraguchi; Hiromu Yoshida
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2012-05-21       Impact factor: 5.640

8.  HIV-infected children living in Central Africa have low persistence of antibodies to vaccines used in the Expanded Program on Immunization.

Authors:  Mathurin C Tejiokem; Ionela Gouandjika; Lydie Béniguel; Marie-Claire Endegue Zanga; Gilbert Tene; Jean C Gody; Elisabeth Njamkepo; Anfumbom Kfutwah; Ida Penda; Catherine Bilong; Dominique Rousset; Régis Pouillot; Frédéric Tangy; Laurence Baril
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2007-12-05       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Impact of inactivated poliovirus vaccine on mucosal immunity: implications for the polio eradication endgame.

Authors:  Edward Pk Parker; Natalie A Molodecky; Margarita Pons-Salort; Kathleen M O'Reilly; Nicholas C Grassly
Journal:  Expert Rev Vaccines       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 5.217

10.  One-Year Decline of Poliovirus Antibodies Following Fractional-Dose Inactivated Poliovirus Vaccine.

Authors:  Ali Faisal Saleem; Ondrej Mach; Mohammad Tahir Yousafzai; Zaubina Kazi; Attaullah Baig; Muhammad Sajid; Vishali Jeyaseelan; Roland W Sutter; Anita K M Zaidi
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2021-04-08       Impact factor: 5.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.