Literature DB >> 10984053

The relative metabolic demand of inhibition and excitation.

D Waldvogel1, P van Gelderen, W Muellbacher, U Ziemann, I Immisch, M Hallett.   

Abstract

By using the (14C)2-deoxyglucose method, inhibition has been shown to be a metabolically active process at the level of the synapse. This is supported by recent results from magnetic resonance spectroscopy that related the changes in neuroenergetics occurring with functional activation to neurotransmitter cycling. However, inhibitory synapses are less numerous and strategically better located than excitatory synapses, indicating that inhibition may be more efficient, and therefore less energy-consuming, than excitation. Here we test this hypothesis using event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging in volunteers whose motor cortex was inhibited during the no-go condition of a go/no-go task, as demonstrated by transcranial magnetic stimulation. Unlike excitation, inhibition evoked no measurable change in the blood-oxygenation-level-dependent signal in the motor cortex, indicating that inhibition is less metabolically demanding. Therefore, the 'activation' seen in functional imaging studies probably results from excitation rather than inhibition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10984053     DOI: 10.1038/35023171

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  67 in total

1.  Activation of frontal premotor areas during suprathreshold transcranial magnetic stimulation of the left primary sensorimotor cortex: a glucose metabolic PET study.

Authors:  H Siebner; M Peller; P Bartenstein; F Willoch; C Rossmeier; M Schwaiger; B Conrad
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Hippocampal deep brain stimulation reduces glucose utilization in the healthy rat brain.

Authors:  Nathalie Van Den Berge; Vincent Keereman; Christian Vanhove; Bregt Van Nieuwenhuyse; Pieter van Mierlo; Robrecht Raedt; Kristl Vonck; Paul Boon; Roel Van Holen
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.488

3.  Brain-behavior correlation in children depends on the neurocognitive network.

Authors:  James R Booth; Douglas D Burman; Joel R Meyer; Barbara L Trommer; Nicholas D Davenport; Todd B Parrish; Darren R Gitelman; M Marsel Mesulam
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 4.  How astrocytes feed hungry neurons.

Authors:  Luc Pellerin
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 5.590

5.  Fusing EEG and fMRI based on a bottom-up model: inferring activation and effective connectivity in neural masses.

Authors:  J Riera; E Aubert; K Iwata; R Kawashima; X Wan; T Ozaki
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2005-05-29       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Primary sensorimotor cortex activation with task-performance after fatiguing hand exercise.

Authors:  Nicola M Benwell; Michelle L Byrnes; Frank L Mastaglia; Gary W Thickbroom
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-15       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Evaluating the spatial relationship of event-related potential and functional MRI sources in the primary visual cortex.

Authors:  Kevin Whittingstall; Gerhard Stroink; Matthias Schmidt
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Reduced functional activation after fatiguing exercise is not confined to primary motor areas.

Authors:  Nicola M Benwell; Frank L Mastaglia; Gary W Thickbroom
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-07-04       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Nonlinear local electrovascular coupling. I: A theoretical model.

Authors:  Jorge J Riera; Xiaohong Wan; Juan Carlos Jimenez; Ryuta Kawashima
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 5.038

10.  Dissociation of response inhibition and performance monitoring in the stop signal task using event-related fMRI.

Authors:  Andre D Chevrier; Michael D Noseworthy; Russell Schachar
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 5.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.