R Perez1, S Freeman, H Sohmer, J Y Sichel. 1. Department of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Hadassah University Hospital, Jerusalem, Israel.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To evaluate and compare the effect of chlorhexidine gluconate, povidoneiodine, and alcohol-three antiseptics used before ear surgery-on the function of the vestibular and cochlear parts of the sand rat's inner ear. The assessment of damage is based on the recording of vestibular evoked potentials (VsEPs) and auditory brainstem response (ABR). STUDY DESIGN: Prospective controlled animal study. METHODS: Fat sand rats were randomly assigned to five different groups, each receiving topical application of a different agent: saline (control), gentamicin (ototoxic control), chlorhexidine, povidone-iodine, and alcohol. Right-side total labyrinthectomy was performed, and a polyethylene tube was inserted into the left (contralateral) middle ear. After baseline recordings were taken of VsEPs and ABR, each animal received five consecutive daily applications of the specific agent into the left middle ear. Three days after the fifth application, evoked potential recordings (VsEPs and ABRs) were repeated and compared with baseline measurements. RESULTS: Administration of saline affected neither VsEPs nor ABR. In contrast, as expected, neither of these responses could be recorded after gentamicin application. After application of chlorhexidine all waves disappeared in all sand rats. Alcohol caused the waves to disappear in some of the animals only. Povidone-iodine did not affect VsEP recordings and had only a small effect on ABR. CONCLUSIONS: Chlorhexidine and alcohol had a clear toxic effect on the vestibular and cochlear function of the inner ear of the sand rat, whereas povidone-iodine did not. Thus, taking into consideration that this is an animal study, it appears that povidone-iodine might be preferable to the other agents tested in disinfecting ears with a perforated tympanic membrane.
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To evaluate and compare the effect of chlorhexidine gluconate, povidoneiodine, and alcohol-three antiseptics used before ear surgery-on the function of the vestibular and cochlear parts of the sand rat's inner ear. The assessment of damage is based on the recording of vestibular evoked potentials (VsEPs) and auditory brainstem response (ABR). STUDY DESIGN: Prospective controlled animal study. METHODS:Fat sand rats were randomly assigned to five different groups, each receiving topical application of a different agent: saline (control), gentamicin (ototoxic control), chlorhexidine, povidone-iodine, and alcohol. Right-side total labyrinthectomy was performed, and a polyethylene tube was inserted into the left (contralateral) middle ear. After baseline recordings were taken of VsEPs and ABR, each animal received five consecutive daily applications of the specific agent into the left middle ear. Three days after the fifth application, evoked potential recordings (VsEPs and ABRs) were repeated and compared with baseline measurements. RESULTS: Administration of saline affected neither VsEPs nor ABR. In contrast, as expected, neither of these responses could be recorded after gentamicin application. After application of chlorhexidine all waves disappeared in all sand rats. Alcohol caused the waves to disappear in some of the animals only. Povidone-iodine did not affect VsEP recordings and had only a small effect on ABR. CONCLUSIONS:Chlorhexidine and alcohol had a clear toxic effect on the vestibular and cochlear function of the inner ear of the sand rat, whereas povidone-iodine did not. Thus, taking into consideration that this is an animal study, it appears that povidone-iodine might be preferable to the other agents tested in disinfecting ears with a perforated tympanic membrane.
Authors: Evan M Schwechter; David Folk; Avanish K Varshney; Bettina C Fries; Sun Jin Kim; David M Hirsh Journal: J Arthroplasty Date: 2011-06-08 Impact factor: 4.757