Literature DB >> 10983646

A comparison of stavudine plus lamivudine versus zidovudine plus lamivudine in combination with indinavir in antiretroviral naive individuals with HIV infection: selection of thymidine analog regimen therapy (START I).

K E Squires1, R Gulick, P Tebas, J Santana, V Mulanovich, R Clark, B Yangco, S I Marlowe, D Wright, C Cohen, T Cooley, J Mauney, K Uffelman, N Schoellkopf, R Grosso, M Stevens.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: No clinical trial results directly comparing two nucleoside analog pairs in a drug regimen for HIV that includes a protease inhibitor are available.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the safety and efficacy of stavudine (d4T) + lamivudine (3TC) with zidovudine (ZDV) + 3TC, each in combination with indinavir (IDV).
DESIGN: Randomized, open-label, multi-center.
SETTING: Fifteen HIV clinical research centers. PATIENTS: Two-hundred and four antiretroviral-naive HIV-1-infected-patients with CD4 cell counts > or = 200 x 10(6)/l and HIV-1 RNA > or = 10,000 copies/ml (bDNA assay), modified to 5000 copies/ml. INTERVENTION: d4T 40 mg twice a day, 3TC 150 mg twice a day plus IDV 800 mg every 8 h compared with ZDV 200 mg every 8 h (modified to 300 mg every 12 h) plus 3TC and IDV. MEASUREMENTS: Primary endpoint: plasma HIV-1 RNA < 500 copies/ml. Additional endpoints: HIV-1 RNA < or = 50 copies/ml; change from baseline in HIV-1 RNA and CD4 cell counts; safety and adverse events.
RESULTS: For HIV-1 RNA, 62% of patients on d4T + 3TC + IDV and 54% of patients on ZDV + 3TC + IDV had < 500 copies/ml HIV RNA at weeks 40 through 48 [90% confidence interval, -0.204 to 0.036; P= 0.213], with 49% and 47% respectively achieving < or = 50 copies/ml at 48 weeks (90% CI, -0.134 to 0.096; P = 0.834). Median change in CD4 cell counts at 48 weeks was +227 x 10(6)/l and +198 x 10(6)/l for the d4T- and ZDV-containing arms, respectively. The median time-weighted average change from baseline in CD4 cell counts was significantly greater at 48 weeks in the d4T-containing arm (142 x 10(6)/l versus 110 x 10(6)/l; P = 0.033). Serious adverse events were not significantly different between treatment arms, but there were significant differences for frequency of adverse events of all severity with increased nausea and vomiting in the ZDV-containing arm, and increased diarrhea and rash in the d4T-containing arm.
CONCLUSIONS: These results support the choice of d4T + 3TC as a nucleoside analog pair in combination with a protease inhibitor in an initial HIV treatment regimen.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10983646     DOI: 10.1097/00002030-200007280-00015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AIDS        ISSN: 0269-9370            Impact factor:   4.177


  13 in total

Review 1.  Stavudine once daily.

Authors:  Susan M Cheer; Karen L Goa
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 2.  Antiretroviral therapy : optimal sequencing of therapy to avoid resistance.

Authors:  Jorge L Martinez-Cajas; Mark A Wainberg
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  Antiretroviral therapy using zidovudine, lamivudine, and efavirenz in South Africa: tolerability and clinical events.

Authors:  Christopher J Hoffmann; Katherine L Fielding; Salome Charalambous; Mark S Sulkowski; Craig Innes; Chloe L Thio; Richard E Chaisson; Gavin J Churchyard; Alison D Grant
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  2008-01-02       Impact factor: 4.177

Review 4.  Nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors in combination therapy for HIV patients: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  M Chowers; B-S Gottesman; L Leibovici; J M Schapiro; M Paul
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2010-05-07       Impact factor: 3.267

5.  A Monte Carlo simulation for modelling outcomes of AIDS treatment regimens.

Authors:  Anke Richter; Brett Hauber; Kit Simpson; Josephine A Mauskopf; Dongping Yin
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.981

6.  Efficacy of zidovudine compared to stavudine, both in combination with lamivudine and indinavir, in human immunodeficiency virus-infected nucleoside-experienced patients with no prior exposure to lamivudine, stavudine, or protease inhibitors (novavir trial).

Authors:  Véronique Joly; Philippe Flandre; Vincent Meiffredy; Françoise Brun-Vezinet; Jean-Albert Gastaut; Cécile Goujard; Gérard Remy; Diane Descamps; Annick Ruffault; Agnès Certain; Jean-Pierre Aboulker; Patrick Yeni
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Early warning indicators for first-line virologic failure independent of adherence measures in a South African urban clinic.

Authors:  Vincent C Marconi; Baohua Wu; Jane Hampton; Claudia E Ordóñez; Brent A Johnson; Dinesh Singh; Sally John; Michelle Gordon; Anna Hare; Richard Murphy; Jean Nachega; Daniel R Kuritzkes; Carlos del Rio; Henry Sunpath
Journal:  AIDS Patient Care STDS       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 5.078

Review 8.  Triple nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor therapy in children.

Authors:  Jennifer Handforth; Mike Sharland
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.022

9.  Increased bone resorption during tenofovir plus lopinavir/ritonavir therapy in Chinese individuals with HIV.

Authors:  E Hsieh; L Fraenkel; W Xia; Y Y Hu; Y Han; K Insogna; M T Yin; J Xie; T Zhu; T Li
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Comparison of tenofovir, zidovudine, or stavudine as part of first-line antiretroviral therapy in a resource-limited-setting: a cohort study.

Authors:  Kavindhran Velen; James J Lewis; Salome Charalambous; Alison D Grant; Gavin J Churchyard; Christopher J Hoffmann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.