Literature DB >> 10982977

Paths of reentry: employment experiences of injured workers.

L Strunin1, L I Boden.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: An injury at work can result in a change in jobs or employers, unemployment, or withdrawal from the labor force. Substantial life changes can occur, often mediated by the initial attempt to return to employment.
METHODS: This study uses ethnographic interviews of 204 workers injured in Florida.
RESULTS: The study describes three paths to reemployment taken by the injured workers. The "welcome back" path provides workers with a sense of being valued by their preinjury employers. This positive effect remains, even for those who are unable to continue working because of limitations imposed by their injuries. Other paths cause workers to feel undervalued, as discarded or damaged goods, and generate hostility and resentment. Females in all groups are less likely to be currently working. White males were more likely than other groups to be employed in skilled jobs and are also the most likely to return to light-duty jobs and to remain in their preinjury jobs over time.
CONCLUSIONS: Half of the workers in this study experience employer indifference or hostility in response to their attempts to return to work after an occupational back injury. After injury, there are both commonalities and meaningful disparities in post-injury experiences of White, Black, and Hispanic male and female workers. Copyright 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10982977     DOI: 10.1002/1097-0274(200010)38:4<373::aid-ajim2>3.0.co;2-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ind Med        ISSN: 0271-3586            Impact factor:   2.214


  9 in total

1.  Employee perspectives on the role of supervisors to prevent workplace disability after injuries.

Authors:  William S Shaw; Michelle M Robertson; Glenn Pransky; Robert K McLellan
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2003-09

2.  Return-to-work activities in a Chinese cultural context.

Authors:  Andy S K Cheng; Patrick Loisel; Michael Feuerstein
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2011-03

Review 3.  Workplace-based return-to-work interventions: optimizing the role of stakeholders in implementation and research.

Authors:  Renée-Louise Franche; Raymond Baril; William Shaw; Michael Nicholas; Patrick Loisel
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2005-12

Review 4.  Work-related outcome assessment instruments.

Authors:  Achim Elfering
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-11-23       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  The effect of a job placement and support program for workers with musculoskeletal injuries: a randomized control trial (RCT) study.

Authors:  C W P Li-Tsang; E J Q Li; C S Lam; K Y L Hui; C C H Chan
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2008-06-18

6.  Supervisors' views on employer responsibility in the return to work process. A focus group study.

Authors:  Kristina Holmgren; Synneve Dahlin Ivanoff; Synneve Dahlin Ivanoff
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2007-03

Review 7.  Prevention of injuries at work: the role of the occupational physician.

Authors:  Stefano Porru; Donatella Placidi; Angela Carta; Lorenzo Alessio
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2005-09-27       Impact factor: 3.015

8.  Ergonomic and socioeconomic risk factors for hospital workers' compensation injury claims.

Authors:  Jon Boyer; Monica Galizzi; Manuel Cifuentes; Angelo d'Errico; Rebecca Gore; Laura Punnett; Craig Slatin
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 2.214

9.  "I grabbed my stuff and walked out": Precarious workers' responses and next steps when faced with procedural unfairness during work injury and claims processes.

Authors:  Nicole Billias; Ellen MacEachen; Sue Sherifali
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2022-08-04
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.