Literature DB >> 10982331

Characteristics of bursal T lymphocytes induced by infectious bursal disease virus.

I J Kim1, S K You, H Kim, H Y Yeh, J M Sharma.   

Abstract

Infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV) is an avian lymphotropic virus that causes immunosuppression. When specific-pathogen-free chickens were exposed to a pathogenic strain of IBDV (IM), the virus rapidly destroyed B cells in the bursa of Fabricius. Extensive viral replication was accompanied by an infiltration of T cells in the bursa. We studied the characteristics of intrabursal T lymphocytes in IBDV-infected chickens and examined whether T cells were involved in virus clearance. Flow cytometric analysis of single-cell suspensions of the bursal tissue revealed that T cells were first detectable at 4 days postinoculation (p.i.). At 7 days p.i., 65% of bursal cells were T cells and 7% were B cells. After virus infection, the numbers of bursal T cells expressing activation markers Ia and CD25 were significantly increased (P<0.03). In addition, IBDV-induced bursal T cells produced elevated levels of interleukin-6-like factor and nitric oxide-inducing factor in vitro. Spleen and bursal cells of IBDV-infected chickens had upregulated gamma interferon gene expression in comparison with virus-free chickens. In IBDV-infected chickens, bursal T cells proliferated in vitro upon stimulation with purified IBDV in a dose-dependent manner (P<0.02), whereas virus-specific T-cell expansion was not detected in the spleen. Cyclosporin A treatment, which reduced the number of circulating T cells and compromised T-cell mitogenesis, increased viral burden in the bursae of IBDV-infected chickens. The results suggest that intrabursal T cells and T-cell-mediated responses may be important in viral clearance and promoting recovery from infection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10982331      PMCID: PMC102083          DOI: 10.1128/jvi.74.19.8884-8892.2000

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Virol        ISSN: 0022-538X            Impact factor:   5.103


  43 in total

Review 1.  Poultry industry strategies for control of immunosuppressive diseases.

Authors:  L W Fussell
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Nitric oxide inducing factor as a measure of antigen and mitogen-specific T cell responses in chickens.

Authors:  K Karaca; I J Kim; S K Reddy; J M Sharma
Journal:  J Immunol Methods       Date:  1996-06-10       Impact factor: 2.303

Review 3.  Viral diseases of the immune system and strategies to control infectious bursal disease by vaccination.

Authors:  D Lütticken
Journal:  Acta Vet Hung       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 0.955

4.  Infectivity and distribution of infectious bursal disease virus in the chicken. Persistence of the virus and lesions.

Authors:  R W Winterfield; A M Fadly; A Bickford
Journal:  Avian Dis       Date:  1972 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.577

5.  Systemic and local antibody responses to infectious bronchitis virus in chickens inoculated with infectious bursal disease virus and control chickens.

Authors:  G Thompson; H Mohammed; B Bauman; S Naqi
Journal:  Avian Dis       Date:  1997 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.577

Review 6.  Molecular mechanisms of immunosuppression by cyclosporins.

Authors:  G Zenke; G Baumann; R Wenger; P Hiestand; V Quesniaux; E Andersen; M H Schreier
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1993-06-23       Impact factor: 5.691

7.  Alteration of chicken heterophil and macrophage functions by the infectious bursal disease virus.

Authors:  K M Lam
Journal:  Microb Pathog       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 3.738

8.  Enhanced expression of cytokine genes in spleen macrophages during acute infection with infectious bursal disease virus in chickens.

Authors:  I J Kim; K Karaca; T L Pertile; S A Erickson; J M Sharma
Journal:  Vet Immunol Immunopathol       Date:  1998-02-27       Impact factor: 2.046

9.  Active and passive protection against variant and classic infectious bursal disease virus strains induced by baculovirus-expressed structural proteins.

Authors:  V N Vakharia; D B Snyder; D Lütticken; S A Mengel-Whereat; P K Savage; G H Edwards; M A Goodwin
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 3.641

10.  Embryogenesis of the bursa of Fabricius: stem cell, microenvironment, and receptor-paracrine pathways.

Authors:  B Glick
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 3.352

View more
  22 in total

Review 1.  Economically important non-oncogenic immunosuppressive viral diseases of chicken--current status.

Authors:  V Balamurugan; J M Kataria
Journal:  Vet Res Commun       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 2.459

2.  Changes in the Cytokine and Toll-Like Receptor Gene Expression Following Infection of Indigenous and Commercial Chickens With Infectious bursal disease virus.

Authors:  G Dhinakar Raj; T M Chozhavel Rajanathan; K Kumanan; S Elankumaran
Journal:  Indian J Virol       Date:  2011-09-06

3.  Differential modulation of cytokine, chemokine and Toll like receptor expression in chickens infected with classical and variant infectious bursal disease virus.

Authors:  Abdul Rauf; Mahesh Khatri; Maria V Murgia; Kwonil Jung; Yehia M Saif
Journal:  Vet Res       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 3.683

4.  Comparison of the expression of cytokine genes in the bursal tissues of the chickens following challenge with infectious bursal disease viruses of varying virulence.

Authors:  Haiwen Liu; Manfu Zhang; Haitang Han; Jihong Yuan; Zandong Li
Journal:  Virol J       Date:  2010-12-08       Impact factor: 4.099

5.  Evaluation of modified vaccinia virus Ankara expressing VP2 protein of infectious bursal disease virus as an immunogen in chickens.

Authors:  Flavia Adriana Zanetti; María Paula Del Médico Zajac; Oscar Alberto Taboga; Gabriela Calamante
Journal:  J Vet Sci       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.672

6.  Immunoreactivity and morphological changes of bursal follicles in chickens infected with vaccine or wild-type strains of the infectious bursal disease virus.

Authors:  Naoyuki Aihara; Noriyuki Horiuchi; Nanase Hikichi; Mariko Ochiai; Yuko Hosoda; Yoko Ishikawa; Yoko Shimazaki; Koji Oishi
Journal:  J Vet Med Sci       Date:  2015-05-10       Impact factor: 1.267

7.  Differential modulation of immune response and cytokine profiles in the bursae and spleen of chickens infected with very virulent infectious bursal disease virus.

Authors:  Mehdi Rasoli; Swee Keong Yeap; Sheau Wei Tan; Kiarash Roohani; Ye Wen Kristeen-Teo; Noorjahan Banu Alitheen; Yasmin Abd Rahaman; Ideris Aini; Mohd Hair Bejo; Pete Kaiser; Abdul Rahman Omar
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 2.741

8.  Changes of CD4+CD25+ cells ratio in immune organs from chickens challenged with infectious bursal disease virus strains with varying virulences.

Authors:  Xiaoxue Yu; Lei Rui; Qiang Shao; Haiwen Liu; Yanan Lu; Yongchao Zhang; Zandong Li
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 5.048

9.  Transcriptomic Analysis of Inbred Chicken Lines Reveals Infectious Bursal Disease Severity Is Associated with Greater Bursal Inflammation In Vivo and More Rapid Induction of Pro-Inflammatory Responses in Primary Bursal Cells Stimulated Ex Vivo.

Authors:  Amin S Asfor; Salik Nazki; Vishwanatha R A P Reddy; Elle Campbell; Katherine L Dulwich; Efstathios S Giotis; Michael A Skinner; Andrew J Broadbent
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 5.048

10.  The effects of different velogenic NDV infections on the chicken bursa of Fabricius.

Authors:  Y W Kristeen-Teo; S K Yeap; S W Tan; A R Omar; A Ideris; S G Tan; N B Alitheen
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 2.741

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.