Literature DB >> 10982076

Different diagnostic methods for detection of influenza epidemics.

H Rebelo-de-Andrade1, M C Zambon.   

Abstract

Linking continuous community-based morbidity recording of influenza-like illness (ILI) with virological sampling has consistently proved its value as one of the earliest indicators of circulating influenza activity. The clinical morbidity recording in the Portuguese national surveillance network, during a 7-year period, and the contribution of different diagnostic techniques, including virus isolation, multiplex RT-PCR, immunocapture enzyme linked immunoassay (EIA) and complement fixation tests (CFTs) for the detection of influenza in such a community-based setting is described and evaluated in this study. There was good correlation between the increase of morbidity, total samples taken and the detection of influenza virus by all the methods although this was less evident for virus isolation and EIA than for RT-PCR or serology. From a total of 1685 throat swabs collected from cases of ILI, 43.6% were RT-PCR positive, 17.5% were positive by capture EIA and in 5% virus isolates were made. The detection of influenza by RT-PCR occurred earlier than by any other method and showed the best correlation with epidemic patterns of morbidity registration. We conclude that in surveillance systems where virus culture is sub-optimal, RT-PCR provides a rapid, sensitive, specific method for detecting influenza viruses from community-based sampling.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10982076      PMCID: PMC2810938          DOI: 10.1017/s0950268899003751

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Epidemiol Infect        ISSN: 0950-2688            Impact factor:   2.451


  6 in total

1.  Active influenza surveillance at the local level: a model for local health agencies.

Authors:  Tista S Ghosh; Richard L Vogt
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2008-01-02       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Combined PCR-heteroduplex mobility assay for detection and differentiation of influenza A viruses from different animal species.

Authors:  J S Ellis; M C Zambon
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Detection of human respiratory syncytial virus in respiratory samples by LightCycler reverse transcriptase PCR.

Authors:  David M Whiley; Melanie W Syrmis; Ian M Mackay; Theo P Sloots
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Surveillance of childhood influenza virus infection: what is the best diagnostic method to use for archival samples?

Authors:  Brent Frisbie; Yi-Wei Tang; Marie Griffin; Katherine Poehling; Peter F Wright; Kathy Holland; Kathryn M Edwards
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Comparison of the Directigen flu A+B test, the QuickVue influenza test, and clinical case definition to viral culture and reverse transcription-PCR for rapid diagnosis of influenza virus infection.

Authors:  Annie Ruest; Sophie Michaud; Sylvie Deslandes; Eric H Frost
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Viral lower respiratory tract infection in the elderly: a prospective in-hospital study.

Authors:  J Flamaing; I Engelmann; E Joosten; M Van Ranst; J Verhaegen; W E Peetermans
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2003-11-06       Impact factor: 3.267

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.