K C Kutner1, D M Erlanger, J Tsai, B Jordan, N R Relkin. 1. Department of Neurology and Neuroscience, New York Presbyterian Hospital-Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York 10021, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the cognitive status of professional football players varies as a function of age and apolipoprotein E (APOE) genotype. METHODS: Fifty-three active players underwent APOE and neuropsychological assessments. Players were grouped according to age (proxy indicator of high/low exposure to contact) and the presence/absence of at least one copy of the epsilon4 allele. Outcome measures were overall cognitive performance and scores in cognitive domains. RESULTS: As a group, older players possessing APOE epsilon4 exhibited significantly lower cognitive test scores than did all other players studied, including non-epsilon4-possessing players and younger epsilon4-carriers. Measures of general cognitive functioning, information-processing speed and accuracy, and attention were related to poorer performance among the epsilon4-carrying players. In an analysis of variance model, the interaction between APOE genotype and age was significant (P = 0.004). As determined using linear regression, age accounted for 34% of the variance in the memory index among APOE epsilon4-possessing players but did not contribute significantly to variance among the non-epsilon4-possessing players. Older APOE epsilon4-carriers were significantly overrepresented among players whose scores indicated possible cognitive impairment, with the criterion of performing two or more standard deviations below the general normal values in a summary index of general cognitive functioning. CONCLUSION: Older professional football players who possessed the APOE epsilon4 allele scored lower on cognitive tests than did players without this allele or less experienced players of any genotype. The cognitive status of professional athletes with repeated exposure to head trauma may therefore be influenced by age, inherited factors such as APOE genotype, and cumulative exposure to contact.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the cognitive status of professional football players varies as a function of age and apolipoprotein E (APOE) genotype. METHODS: Fifty-three active players underwent APOE and neuropsychological assessments. Players were grouped according to age (proxy indicator of high/low exposure to contact) and the presence/absence of at least one copy of the epsilon4 allele. Outcome measures were overall cognitive performance and scores in cognitive domains. RESULTS: As a group, older players possessing APOE epsilon4 exhibited significantly lower cognitive test scores than did all other players studied, including non-epsilon4-possessing players and younger epsilon4-carriers. Measures of general cognitive functioning, information-processing speed and accuracy, and attention were related to poorer performance among the epsilon4-carrying players. In an analysis of variance model, the interaction between APOE genotype and age was significant (P = 0.004). As determined using linear regression, age accounted for 34% of the variance in the memory index among APOE epsilon4-possessing players but did not contribute significantly to variance among the non-epsilon4-possessing players. Older APOE epsilon4-carriers were significantly overrepresented among players whose scores indicated possible cognitive impairment, with the criterion of performing two or more standard deviations below the general normal values in a summary index of general cognitive functioning. CONCLUSION: Older professional football players who possessed the APOE epsilon4 allele scored lower on cognitive tests than did players without this allele or less experienced players of any genotype. The cognitive status of professional athletes with repeated exposure to head trauma may therefore be influenced by age, inherited factors such as APOE genotype, and cumulative exposure to contact.
Authors: Denise D Correa; Lisa M DeAngelis; Weiji Shi; Howard T Thaler; Michael Lin; Lauren E Abrey Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2006-07-19 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Liane E Hunter; Yun Freudenberg-Hua; Peter Davies; Mimi Kim; Richard B Lipton; Walter F Stewart; Priyanka Srinivasan; ShanShan Hu; Michael L Lipton Journal: JAMA Neurol Date: 2020-04-01 Impact factor: 18.302
Authors: Thor D Stein; Philip H Montenigro; Victor E Alvarez; Weiming Xia; John F Crary; Yorghos Tripodis; Daniel H Daneshvar; Jesse Mez; Todd Solomon; Gaoyuan Meng; Caroline A Kubilus; Kerry A Cormier; Steven Meng; Katharine Babcock; Patrick Kiernan; Lauren Murphy; Christopher J Nowinski; Brett Martin; Diane Dixon; Robert A Stern; Robert C Cantu; Neil W Kowall; Ann C McKee Journal: Acta Neuropathol Date: 2015-05-06 Impact factor: 17.088
Authors: Aaron J Carman; Rennie Ferguson; Robert Cantu; R Dawn Comstock; Penny A Dacks; Steven T DeKosky; Sam Gandy; James Gilbert; Chad Gilliland; Gerard Gioia; Christopher Giza; Michael Greicius; Brian Hainline; Ronald L Hayes; James Hendrix; Barry Jordan; James Kovach; Rachel F Lane; Rebekah Mannix; Thomas Murray; Tad Seifert; Diana W Shineman; Eric Warren; Elisabeth Wilde; Huntington Willard; Howard M Fillit Journal: Nat Rev Neurol Date: 2015-03-17 Impact factor: 42.937
Authors: Corina O Bondi; Bridgette D Semple; Linda J Noble-Haeusslein; Nicole D Osier; Shaun W Carlson; C Edward Dixon; Christopher C Giza; Anthony E Kline Journal: Neurosci Biobehav Rev Date: 2014-12-10 Impact factor: 8.989
Authors: Rachel E Bennett; Thomas J Esparza; Hal A Lewis; Eddie Kim; Christine L Mac Donald; Patrick M Sullivan; David L Brody Journal: J Neuropathol Exp Neurol Date: 2013-05 Impact factor: 3.685