Literature DB >> 10981457

Intimate partner violence prevalence estimation using telephone surveys: understanding the effect of nonresponse bias.

L A McNutt1, R Lee.   

Abstract

To assess the effect of nonresponse bias in telephone prevalence studies of intimate partner violence, the authors asked women visiting a health center in Albany, New York, during 1998 about their willingness to participate in telephone surveys. Women physically victimized by a male partner were more likely than other women to say they would participate in telephone surveys (66.7% vs. 44.4%, p = 0.03). Among women severely victimized, those living with their partner were less willing to participate than those not cohabiting (45.5% vs. 91.7%, p = 0.03). Including questions about willingness to participate in telephone surveys in studies of other kinds may be a useful method of identifying nonresponse bias.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10981457     DOI: 10.1093/aje/152.5.438

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0002-9262            Impact factor:   4.897


  11 in total

1.  Agreement on intimate partner violence among a sample of blue-collar couples.

Authors:  Carol B Cunradi; Melina Bersamin; Genevieve Ames
Journal:  J Interpers Violence       Date:  2008-04-22

2.  Intimate partner violence and cardiovascular risk in women: a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Lise Eilin Stene; Geir Wenberg Jacobsen; Grete Dyb; Aage Tverdal; Berit Schei
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 2.681

3.  Variation in estimates of limited health literacy by assessment instruments and non-response bias.

Authors:  Joan M Griffin; Melissa R Partin; Siamak Noorbaloochi; Joseph P Grill; Somnath Saha; Annamay Snyder; Sean Nugent; Alisha Baines Simon; Ian Gralnek; Dawn Provenzale; Michelle van Ryn
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2010-03-12       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Problem Drinking, Unemployment, and Intimate Partner Violence among a Sample of Construction Industry Workers and their Partners.

Authors:  Carol B Cunradi; Michael Todd; Michael Duke; Genevieve Ames
Journal:  J Fam Violence       Date:  2009-02

5.  Gender as a Risk Factor for Functional Movement Disorders: The Role of Sexual Abuse.

Authors:  Isaiah Kletenik; Stefan H Sillau; Sanaz Attaripour Isfahani; Kathrin LaFaver; Mark Hallett; Brian D Berman
Journal:  Mov Disord Clin Pract       Date:  2019-12-13

6.  Stressful life events, intimate partner violence, and perceived stress in the postpartum period: longitudinal findings in rural Pakistan.

Authors:  Sarah C Haight; John A Gallis; Esther O Chung; Victoria Baranov; Amina Bibi; Allison Frost; Ashley Hagaman; Siham Sikander; Joanna Maselko; Lisa M Bates
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 4.519

7.  Lifetime Prevalence Rates and Overlap of Physical, Psychological, and Sexual Dating Abuse Perpetration and Victimization in a National Sample of Youth.

Authors:  Michele L Ybarra; Dorothy L Espelage; Jennifer Langhinrichsen-Rohling; Josephine D Korchmaros; Danah Boyd
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2016-04-20

8.  "It happens to clinicians too": an Australian prevalence study of intimate partner and family violence against health professionals.

Authors:  Elizabeth McLindon; Cathy Humphreys; Kelsey Hegarty
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 2.809

9.  Can nonresponse bias and known methodological differences explain the large discrepancies in the reported prevalence rate of violence found in Swedish studies?

Authors:  Johanna Simmons; Katarina Swahnberg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-05-09       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Intimate Partner Violence Experienced by Physicians.

Authors:  Ellen T Reibling; Brian Distelberg; Mindi Guptill; Barbara Couden Hernandez
Journal:  J Prim Care Community Health       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.