Literature DB >> 10981207

A follow-up study of the quality of life in cancer patients with different prognoses.

G I Ringdal1, K Ringdal.   

Abstract

The present study examines differences in quality of life between two points in time in a heterogeneous sample of cancer patients with different prognoses. The original sample comprised 253 patients, while the follow-up data obtained 3-4 years later included 75 patients, that is, 92% of the survivors. All the patients completed a questionnaire including the EORTC QLQ-C30. The research questions focus on overall changes in quality of life, and whether patients with a good prognosis would show less negative changes in quality of life than patients with a poor prognosis. The overall observed changes in quality of life were surprisingly small over a 3-4 year period. This study shows that prognoses do predict changes in social functioning and in some physical aspects of quality of life over a 3-4 year period after the assessment of prognoses by physicians. Prognoses did not, however, predict changes in psychological aspects of quality of life.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10981207     DOI: 10.1023/a:1008937724943

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Life Res        ISSN: 0962-9343            Impact factor:   4.147


  23 in total

1.  Assessing the consistency of psychometric properties of the HRQoL scales within the EORTC QLQ-C30 across populations by means of the Mokken Scaling Model.

Authors:  K Ringdal; G I Ringdal; S Kaasa; K Bjordal; F Wisløff; S Sundstrøm; M J Hjermstad
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  A modular approach to quality-of-life assessment in cancer clinical trials.

Authors:  N K Aaronson; M Bullinger; S Ahmedzai
Journal:  Recent Results Cancer Res       Date:  1988

3.  Treatment intention in hospitalized cancer patients in oncological wards in Norway: a national survey.

Authors:  S Kaasa; O Klepp; S Hagen; E Wist; S Kvinnsland
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 12.111

4.  Breast conservation versus mastectomy. Is there a difference in psychological adjustment or quality of life in the year after surgery?

Authors:  P A Ganz; A C Schag; J J Lee; M L Polinsky; S J Tan
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1992-04-01       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  The relationship of psychological distress, extent of disease, and performance status in patients with lung cancer.

Authors:  D F Cella; B Orofiamma; J C Holland; P M Silberfarb; S Tross; M Feldstein; M Perry; L H Maurer; R Comis; E J Orav
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1987-10-01       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Measuring the quality of life of cancer patients: the Functional Living Index-Cancer: development and validation.

Authors:  H Schipper; J Clinch; A McMurray; M Levitt
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  The impact of generalized malignant melanoma on quality of life evaluated by the EORTC questionnaire technique.

Authors:  V Sigurdardóttir; C Bolund; Y Brandberg; M Sullivan
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  Quality of life and state of health for patients with cancer in the head and neck.

Authors:  B Drettner; A Ahlbom
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  1983 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.494

9.  Quality of life of cancer patients with different prognoses.

Authors:  G I Ringdal; K Ringdal; S Kvinnsland; K G Götestam
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 4.147

10.  Quality of life during chemotherapy for small cell lung cancer. II. A longitudinal study of the EORTC Core Quality of Life Questionnaire and comparison with the Sickness Impact Profile.

Authors:  B Bergman; M Sullivan; S Sörenson
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 4.089

View more
  5 in total

1.  Quality of life of breast cancer patients in the course of adjuvant radiotherapy.

Authors:  K Budischewski; S Fischbeck; St Mose
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2007-08-07       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Quality of Life of Cancer Patients Receiving Enteral Nutrition: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Elwira Gliwska; Dominika Guzek; Zuzanna Przekop; Jacek Sobocki; Dominika Głąbska
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-12-19       Impact factor: 5.717

3.  Health-related quality of life in cancer immunotherapy: a systematic perspective, using causal loop diagrams.

Authors:  Elizabeth Beaulieu; Anne Spanjaart; Ashley Roes; Bernard Rachet; Stéphane Dalle; Marie José Kersten; Delphine Maucort-Boulch; Mohammad S Jalali
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2022-03-17       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Selected elements of socio-demographic status and lifestyle as factors determining subjective assessment of life in women after mastectomy.

Authors:  Magdalena Skrzypczak; Urszula Czerniak; Piotr Laski
Journal:  Contemp Oncol (Pozn)       Date:  2013-01-04

5.  Impact of cancer occurrence on health-related quality of life: a longitudinal pre-post assessment.

Authors:  Stéphanie Boini; Serge Briançon; Francis Guillemin; Pilar Galan; Serge Hercberg
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2004-01-09       Impact factor: 3.186

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.