Literature DB >> 10980940

Severity scoring for acute pancreatitis: where do we stand in 1999?

L K Gates1.   

Abstract

The last few years have seen a rapid evolution in the care of acute pancreatitis. Interventions such as endoscopic sphincterotomy with stone extraction and administration of platelet activating factor are effective but must be applied early. Ranson criteria and modified Glasgow score are widely used, but these systems often cannot separate mild versus severe pancreatitits within 24 hours of hospital admission. The Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE II) is a good predictive system for severity of disease at admission. New single agent biologic markers hold some promise. The CT severity index is better than APACHE II for predicting local complications but not as good for predicting mortality and systemic morbidity. Modern care of acute pancreatitis requires the development of a rapid response team model, with early assessment by APACHE II, biologic markers, and, if indicated, the CT Severity Index.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10980940     DOI: 10.1007/s11894-996-0012-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep        ISSN: 1522-8037


  32 in total

1.  Prediction of severity of acute pancreatitis: an alternative approach.

Authors:  S T Fan; T K Choi; E C Lai; J Wong
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  C-reactive protein, antiproteases and complement factors as objective markers of severity in acute pancreatitis.

Authors:  C Wilson; A Heads; A Shenkin; C W Imrie
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  Controlled trial of urgent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic sphincterotomy versus conservative treatment for acute pancreatitis due to gallstones.

Authors:  J P Neoptolemos; D L Carr-Locke; N J London; I A Bailey; D James; D P Fossard
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1988-10-29       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 4.  Etiological and prognostic factors in human acute pancreatitis: a review.

Authors:  J H Ranson
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 10.864

5.  Interleukin-6 is a useful marker for early prediction of the severity of acute pancreatitis.

Authors:  T Inagaki; M Hoshino; T Hayakawa; H Ohara; T Yamada; H Yamada; M Iida; T Nakazawa; T Ogasawara; A Uchida; C Hasegawa; M Miyaji; T Takeuchi
Journal:  Pancreas       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 3.327

6.  Prognostic indicators in acute pancreatitis: CT vs APACHE II.

Authors:  J T De Sanctis; M J Lee; G S Gazelle; G W Boland; E F Halpern; S Saini; P R Mueller
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 2.350

7.  Acute pancreatitis: value of CT in establishing prognosis.

Authors:  E J Balthazar; D L Robinson; A J Megibow; J H Ranson
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  C reactive protein: an aid to assessment and monitoring of acute pancreatitis.

Authors:  A D Mayer; M J McMahon; M Bowen; E H Cooper
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1984-02       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Acute pancreatitis: prognostic value of CT.

Authors:  E J Balthazar; J H Ranson; D P Naidich; A J Megibow; R Caccavale; M M Cooper
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Prognostic factors in acute pancreatitis.

Authors:  S L Blamey; C W Imrie; J O'Neill; W H Gilmour; D C Carter
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 23.059

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Medical management of acute pancreatitis: strategies, reality, and potential.

Authors: 
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2000-04
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.