Literature DB >> 10980281

L-163,491 is a partial angiotensin AT(1) receptor agonist in the hindquarters vascular bed of the cat.

B J De Witt1, E A Garrison, H C Champion, P J Kadowitz.   

Abstract

Responses to the nonpeptide angiotensin II agonist 5, 7-Dimethyl-2-ethyl-3-[[2'-([butyloxycarbonyl) aminosulfonyl]-5'-(3-methyoxybenzyl)-[1, 1'-biphenyl]-4-yl]methyl]-3H-imidazo[4,5-b]pyridine (L-163,491) were investigated and compared with responses to angiotensin II, angiotensin IV and norepinephrine in the hindquarters vascular bed of the cat under constant-flow conditions. Injections of L-163,491 into the hindquarter perfusion circuit caused dose-related increases in hindquarters perfusion pressure. In relative terms, angiotensin II was more potent than norepinephrine, which was more potent than angiotensin IV and L-163,491 in increasing hindlimb vascular resistance. The slope of the dose-response curve for L-163,491 was flat, while the apparent affinity of the compound for angiotensin AT(1) receptors was slightly greater than angiotensin IV. Responses to L-163,491 were inhibited by the angiotensin AT(1) receptor antagonist DuP 532 (2-propyl-4-pentafluoroethyl-1-[2'-(1H-tetrazol-5-yl)bipheny l-4-yl)me thyl]imidazole-5-carboxylic acid) and were not altered by the angiotensin AT(2) receptor antagonist PD123,319 (S(+)-1-[[4-(Dimethylamino)-3-methylphenyl]methyl]-5-(diphenylacetyl+ ++) -4,5,6,7-tetrahydro-1H-imidazo[4,5-c]pyridine-6-carboxylic acid ditribluoroacetate). However, the increase in hindlimb perfusion pressure in response to angiotensin II and angiotensin IV was significantly decreased following injection of L-163,491. These data suggest that the nonpeptide angiotensin analog L-163,491 has partial agonist activity, which is dependent on the stimulation of angiotensin AT(1) receptors in the hindquarters vascular bed of the cat.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10980281     DOI: 10.1016/s0014-2999(00)00612-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Pharmacol        ISSN: 0014-2999            Impact factor:   4.432


  6 in total

1.  Central hubs prediction for bio networks by directed hypergraph - GA with validation to COVID-19 PPI.

Authors:  Sathyanarayanan Gopalakrishnan; Supriya Sridharan; Soumya Ranjan Nayak; Janmenjoy Nayak; Swaminathan Venkataraman
Journal:  Pattern Recognit Lett       Date:  2021-12-25       Impact factor: 3.756

2.  Genetic Risk Factors for the Development of COVID-19 Coronavirus Infection.

Authors:  O S Glotov; A N Chernov; S G Scherbak; V S Baranov
Journal:  Russ J Genet       Date:  2021-08-30       Impact factor: 0.581

Review 3.  Insights into the evolutionary and prophylactic analysis of SARS-CoV-2: A review.

Authors:  Fatima Akram; Ikram Ul Haq; Amna Aqeel; Zeeshan Ahmed; Fatima Iftikhar Shah; Ali Nawaz; Javaria Zafar; Rukhma Sattar
Journal:  J Virol Methods       Date:  2021-11-24       Impact factor: 2.014

4.  Research and Development on Therapeutic Agents and Vaccines for COVID-19 and Related Human Coronavirus Diseases.

Authors:  Cynthia Liu; Qiongqiong Zhou; Yingzhu Li; Linda V Garner; Steve P Watkins; Linda J Carter; Jeffrey Smoot; Anne C Gregg; Angela D Daniels; Susan Jervey; Dana Albaiu
Journal:  ACS Cent Sci       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 14.553

Review 5.  Therapeutics for COVID-19: from computation to practices-where we are, where we are heading to.

Authors:  Probir Kumar Ojha; Supratik Kar; Jillella Gopala Krishna; Kunal Roy; Jerzy Leszczynski
Journal:  Mol Divers       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 2.943

Review 6.  COVID-19: inflammatory responses, structure-based drug design and potential therapeutics.

Authors:  Neetu Tripathi; Neeraj Tripathi; Manoj Kumar Goshisht
Journal:  Mol Divers       Date:  2021-01-05       Impact factor: 3.364

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.