Literature DB >> 10980147

Phylogenetically enhanced statistical tools for RNA structure prediction.

V R Akmaev1, S T Kelley, G D Stormo.   

Abstract

MOTIVATION: Methods that predict the structure of molecules by looking for statistical correlation have been quite effective. Unfortunately, these methods often disregard phylogenetic information in the sequences they analyze. Here, we present a number of statistics for RNA molecular-structure prediction. Besides common pair-wise comparisons, we consider a few reasonable statistics for base-triple predictions, and present an elaborate analysis of these methods. All these statistics incorporate phylogenetic relationships of the sequences in the analysis to varying degrees, and the different nature of these tests gives a wide choice of statistical tools for RNA structure prediction.
RESULTS: Starting from statistics that incorporate phylogenetic information only as independent sequence evolution models for each position of a multiple alignment, and extending this idea to a joint evolution model of two positions, we enhance the usual purely statistical methods (e.g. methods based on the Mutual Information statistic) with the use of phylogenetic information available in the sequences. In particular, we present a joint model based on the HKY evolution model, and consequently a X(2) test of independence for two positions. A significant part of this work is devoted to some mathematical analysis of these methods. We tested these statistics on regions of 16S and 23S rRNA, and tRNA.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10980147     DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/16.6.501

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioinformatics        ISSN: 1367-4803            Impact factor:   6.937


  16 in total

1.  Improved statistical methods reveal direct interactions between 16S and 23S rRNA.

Authors:  S T Kelley; V R Akmaev; G D Stormo
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-12-15       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Evaluation and refinement of tmRNA structure using gene sequences from natural microbial communities.

Authors:  S T Kelley; J K Harris; N R Pace
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 4.942

3.  Discovering common stem-loop motifs in unaligned RNA sequences.

Authors:  J Gorodkin; S L Stricklin; G D Stormo
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2001-05-15       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  Finding important sites in protein sequences.

Authors:  Peter J Bickel; Katherina J Kechris; Philip C Spector; Gary J Wedemayer; Alexander N Glazer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-11-04       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Prediction of consensus structural motifs in a family of coregulated RNA sequences.

Authors:  Yuh-Jyh Hu
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2002-09-01       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  RNA secondary structure prediction from sequence alignments using a network of k-nearest neighbor classifiers.

Authors:  Eckart Bindewald; Bruce A Shapiro
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.942

Review 7.  Computational methods in noncoding RNA research.

Authors:  Ariane Machado-Lima; Hernando A del Portillo; Alan Mitchell Durham
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2007-09-04       Impact factor: 2.259

8.  Structural implications of novel diversity in eucaryal RNase P RNA.

Authors:  Steven M Marquez; J Kirk Harris; Scott T Kelley; James W Brown; Scott C Dawson; Elisabeth C Roberts; Norman R Pace
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2005-04-05       Impact factor: 4.942

9.  A statistical test for conserved RNA structure shows lack of evidence for structure in lncRNAs.

Authors:  Elena Rivas; Jody Clements; Sean R Eddy
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2016-11-07       Impact factor: 28.547

Review 10.  Evolutionary conservation of RNA sequence and structure.

Authors:  Elena Rivas
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev RNA       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 9.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.