Literature DB >> 10980029

Representation of the temporal envelope of sounds in the human brain.

A L Giraud1, C Lorenzi, J Ashburner, J Wable, I Johnsrude, R Frackowiak, A Kleinschmidt.   

Abstract

The cerebral representation of the temporal envelope of sounds was studied in five normal-hearing subjects using functional magnetic resonance imaging. The stimuli were white noise, sinusoidally amplitude-modulated at frequencies ranging from 4 to 256 Hz. This range includes low AM frequencies (up to 32 Hz) essential for the perception of the manner of articulation and syllabic rate, and high AM frequencies (above 64 Hz) essential for the perception of voicing and prosody. The right lower brainstem (superior olivary complex), the right inferior colliculus, the left medial geniculate body, Heschl's gyrus, the superior temporal gyrus, the superior temporal sulcus, and the inferior parietal lobule were specifically responsive to AM. Global tuning curves in these regions suggest that the human auditory system is organized as a hierarchical filter bank, each processing level responding preferentially to a given AM frequency, 256 Hz for the lower brainstem, 32-256 Hz for the inferior colliculus, 16 Hz for the medial geniculate body, 8 Hz for the primary auditory cortex, and 4-8 Hz for secondary regions. The time course of the hemodynamic responses showed sustained and transient components with reverse frequency dependent patterns: the lower the AM frequency the better the fit with a sustained response model, the higher the AM frequency the better the fit with a transient response model. Using cortical maps of best modulation frequency, we demonstrate that the spatial representation of AM frequencies varies according to the response type. Sustained responses yield maps of low frequencies organized in large clusters. Transient responses yield maps of high frequencies represented by a mosaic of small clusters. Very few voxels were tuned to intermediate frequencies (32-64 Hz). We did not find spatial gradients of AM frequencies associated with any response type. Our results suggest that two frequency ranges (up to 16 and 128 Hz and above) are represented in the cortex by different response types. However, the spatial segregation of these two ranges is not systematic. Most cortical regions were tuned to low frequencies and only a few to high frequencies. Yet, voxels that show a preference for low frequencies were also responsive to high frequencies. Overall, our study shows that the temporal envelope of sounds is processed by both distinct (hierarchically organized series of filters) and shared (high and low AM frequencies eliciting different responses at the same cortical locus) neural substrates. This layout suggests that the human auditory system is organized in a parallel fashion that allows a degree of separate routing for groups of AM frequencies conveying different information and preserves a possibility for integration of complementary features in cortical auditory regions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10980029     DOI: 10.1152/jn.2000.84.3.1588

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  103 in total

1.  Detection and quantification of a wide range of fMRI temporal responses using a physiologically-motivated basis set.

Authors:  Michael P Harms; Jennifer R Melcher
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Functional asymmetry for auditory processing in human primary auditory cortex.

Authors:  Joseph T Devlin; Josephine Raley; Elizabeth Tunbridge; Katherine Lanary; Anna Floyer-Lea; Charvy Narain; Ian Cohen; Timothy Behrens; Peter Jezzard; Paul M Matthews; David R Moore
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-12-17       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 3.  Perceptuo-motor interactions in the perceptual organization of speech: evidence from the verbal transformation effect.

Authors:  Anahita Basirat; Jean-Luc Schwartz; Marc Sato
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Whole-brain, time-locked activation with simple tasks revealed using massive averaging and model-free analysis.

Authors:  Javier Gonzalez-Castillo; Ziad S Saad; Daniel A Handwerker; Souheil J Inati; Noah Brenowitz; Peter A Bandettini
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-03-19       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Sensitivity to temporal modulation rate and spectral bandwidth in the human auditory system: MEG evidence.

Authors:  Yadong Wang; Nai Ding; Nayef Ahmar; Juanjuan Xiang; David Poeppel; Jonathan Z Simon
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Discrimination of speech stimuli based on neuronal response phase patterns depends on acoustics but not comprehension.

Authors:  Mary F Howard; David Poeppel
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 7.  Temporal context in speech processing and attentional stream selection: a behavioral and neural perspective.

Authors:  Elana M Zion Golumbic; David Poeppel; Charles E Schroeder
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2012-01-29       Impact factor: 2.381

8.  Detection and identification of speech sounds using cortical activity patterns.

Authors:  T M Centanni; A M Sloan; A C Reed; C T Engineer; R L Rennaker; M P Kilgard
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 3.590

9.  Temporal envelope of time-compressed speech represented in the human auditory cortex.

Authors:  Kirill V Nourski; Richard A Reale; Hiroyuki Oya; Hiroto Kawasaki; Christopher K Kovach; Haiming Chen; Matthew A Howard; John F Brugge
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-12-09       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Processing of broadband stimuli across A1 layers in young and aged rats.

Authors:  Larry F Hughes; Jeremy G Turner; Jennifer L Parrish; Donald M Caspary
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-09-20       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.