Literature DB >> 10979525

An analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of the Hawkins and Neer subacromial impingement signs.

P B MacDonald1, P Clark, K Sutherland.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of the Neer and Hawkins impingement signs for the diagnosis of subacromial bursitis or rotator cuff pathosis. Eighty-five consecutive patients undergoing shoulder arthroscopy by a single surgeon were documented prospectively for the positive and negative clinical and arthroscopic pathologic findings. The Neer sign was found to have a sensitivity of 75% for the appearance suggestive of subacromial bursitis; this compared with 92% for the Hawkins sign. For rotator cuff tearing, the sensitivity of the Neer sign was 85% and the sensitivity of the Hawkins sign was 88%. Specificity and positive predictive values for the two tests were low, being not much higher than pretest probability. The two tests had a high negative predictive value (96% for bursitis, 90% for rotator cuff tearing) when they were combined. The results are compared with those reported in the literature. We conclude that the Neer and Hawkins signs are sensitive for appearances suggestive of subacromial bursitis and rotator cuff partial or complete tearing with a high negative predictive value. However, they lack specificity in comparison with arthroscopic findings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10979525     DOI: 10.1067/mse.2000.106918

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  40 in total

Review 1.  Treatment of impingement syndrome: a systematic review of the effects on functional limitations and return to work.

Authors:  Elske Faber; Judith I Kuiper; Alex Burdorf; Harald S Miedema; Jan A N Verhaar
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2006-03

2.  Does a positive neer impingement sign reflect rotator cuff contact with the acromion?

Authors:  Xiaofeng Jia; Jong Hun Ji; Vinodhkumar Pannirselvam; Steve A Petersen; Edward G McFarland
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-09-28       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Clinical evaluation of the shoulder shrug sign.

Authors:  Xiaofeng Jia; Jong-Hun Ji; Steve A Petersen; Jennifer Keefer; Edward G McFarland
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-06-10       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  A proposed evidence-based shoulder special testing examination algorithm: clinical utility based on a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Nicklaus E Biederwolf
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2013-08

5.  Comparison of manual therapy techniques with therapeutic exercise in the treatment of shoulder impingement: a randomized controlled pilot clinical trial.

Authors:  Aimie F Kachingwe; Beth Phillips; Eric Sletten; Scott W Plunkett
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2008

6.  Communication breakdown: clinicians disagree on subacromial impingement.

Authors:  Pieter Bas de Witte; Jurriaan H de Groot; Erik W van Zwet; Paula M Ludewig; Jochem Nagels; Rob G H H Nelissen; Jon P Braman
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 2.602

7.  Exercise therapy after corticosteroid injection for moderate to severe shoulder pain: large pragmatic randomised trial.

Authors:  Dickon P Crawshaw; Philip S Helliwell; Elizabeth M A Hensor; Elaine M Hay; Simon J Aldous; Philip G Conaghan
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-06-28

8.  Frequency of use of clinical shoulder examination tests by experienced shoulder surgeons.

Authors:  Aaron D Sciascia; Tracy Spigelman; W Ben Kibler; Timothy L Uhl
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2012 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.860

9.  Predictive value of preoperative clinical examination for subacromial decompression in impingement syndrome.

Authors:  Thomas Kappe; Kevin Knappe; Mohammed Elsharkawi; Heiko Reichel; Balkan Cakir
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-01-22       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 10.  Clinical examination of the rotator cuff.

Authors:  Nitin B Jain; Reg B Wilcox; Jeffrey N Katz; Laurence D Higgins
Journal:  PM R       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 2.298

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.