Literature DB >> 10979517

The implementation of California's tobacco tax initiative: the critical role of outsider strategies in protecting Proposition 99.

E D Balbach1, M P Traynor, S A Glantz.   

Abstract

Enacted in 1988, Proposition 99 increased California's cigarette tax by 25 cents per pack and allocated a minimum of 20 percent of the revenues to fund antitobacco education. Tobacco control advocates had used an initiative to secure the tax increase because the legislature had not increased the tobacco tax since 1967, even though public opinion polls showed that the tax was politically popular. Advocates, however, then had to return to the legislature to negotiate implementing legislation. Between 1989 and 1996, the legislature underfunded the Proposition 99 Health Education programs by over $273 million. This underfunding occurred because the public health groups failed to exercise power, ideas, and the leadership needed for legislative success. Even successful litigation against the governor failed to restore the programs. In July 1996, however, the underexpenditures stopped because the issue of the diversions received significant media and public attention. The tobacco control groups used a variety of outsider strategies, including paid advertising, free media, and a grassroots campaign, and the leadership of these groups, in addition to the lobbyists, got involved in the campaign to secure implementing legislation. Without ongoing public pressure, it is likely that policy changes created by tobacco tax initiatives will dissipate into something acceptable to powerful insider interests, such as the tobacco and medical service provider industries.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10979517     DOI: 10.1215/03616878-25-4-689

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Polit Policy Law        ISSN: 0361-6878            Impact factor:   2.265


  10 in total

1.  Increasing lung cancer death rates among young women in southern and midwestern States.

Authors:  Ahmedin Jemal; Jiemin Ma; Philip S Rosenberg; Rebecca Siegel; William F Anderson
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-06-25       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  The alcohol industry, the tobacco industry, and excise taxes in the US 1986-89: new insights from the tobacco documents.

Authors:  Matthew Lesch; Jim McCambridge
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 4.135

Review 3.  What is known about tobacco industry efforts to influence tobacco tax? A systematic review of empirical studies.

Authors:  Katherine E Smith; Emily Savell; Anna B Gilmore
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2012-08-12       Impact factor: 7.552

4.  Twitter analysis of California's failed campaign to raise the state's tobacco tax by popular vote in 2012.

Authors:  Miao Feng; John P Pierce; Glen Szczypka; Lisa Vera; Sherry Emery
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 7.552

5.  Global health governance and the commercial sector: a documentary analysis of tobacco company strategies to influence the WHO framework convention on tobacco control.

Authors:  Heide Weishaar; Jeff Collin; Katherine Smith; Thilo Grüning; Sema Mandal; Anna Gilmore
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 11.069

6.  Follow the money: how the billions of dollars that flow from smokers in poor nations to companies in rich nations greatly exceed funding for global tobacco control and what might be done about it.

Authors:  Cynthia Callard
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 7.552

7.  Implementation failures in the use of two New Zealand laws to control the tobacco industry: 1989-2005.

Authors:  George Thomson; Nick Wilson
Journal:  Aust New Zealand Health Policy       Date:  2005-12-14

8.  Political dynamics promoting the incremental regulation of secondhand smoke: a case study of New South Wales, Australia.

Authors:  Katherine Bryan-Jones; Simon Chapman
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2006-07-21       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  The Policy Dystopia Model: An Interpretive Analysis of Tobacco Industry Political Activity.

Authors:  Selda Ulucanlar; Gary J Fooks; Anna B Gilmore
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 11.069

10.  Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975-2005, featuring trends in lung cancer, tobacco use, and tobacco control.

Authors:  Ahmedin Jemal; Michael J Thun; Lynn A G Ries; Holly L Howe; Hannah K Weir; Melissa M Center; Elizabeth Ward; Xiao-Cheng Wu; Christie Eheman; Robert Anderson; Umed A Ajani; Betsy Kohler; Brenda K Edwards
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2008-11-25       Impact factor: 13.506

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.