T Nabeshima1. 1. Department of Ophthalmology, Iwate Medical University School of Medicine, Morioka, Japan.
Abstract
PURPOSE: In order to use multifocal electroretinogram (m-ERG) for clinical assessment, we investigated the effects of aging on waves of the first and second order kernels of the m-ERG. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: m-ERGs were recorded from 93 eyes (refractive error 0-(-)3.0 D) of 56 normal subjects (range 12-79, mean 44.2 +/- 20.7 years of age) using the Visual Evoked Response Imaging System (VERIS Science, version 3.0.1). We analyzed effects of aging on the response densities and the peak latencies of the first positive wave (P 1) of the first order kernel and the second and third positive waves (P 2 and P 3) of the second order kernel. RESULTS: The response densities of the P 1 and P 2 waves significantly decreased, and the peak latencies of the P 1, P 2 and P 3 were significantly prolonged (p < 0.05) in the subjects above 50 years old. CONCLUSION: The results suggested that the aging effect on the m-ERG should be considered when evaluating retinal function using m-ERGs in basic and clinical studies.
PURPOSE: In order to use multifocal electroretinogram (m-ERG) for clinical assessment, we investigated the effects of aging on waves of the first and second order kernels of the m-ERG. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: m-ERGs were recorded from 93 eyes (refractive error 0-(-)3.0 D) of 56 normal subjects (range 12-79, mean 44.2 +/- 20.7 years of age) using the Visual Evoked Response Imaging System (VERIS Science, version 3.0.1). We analyzed effects of aging on the response densities and the peak latencies of the first positive wave (P 1) of the first order kernel and the second and third positive waves (P 2 and P 3) of the second order kernel. RESULTS: The response densities of the P 1 and P 2 waves significantly decreased, and the peak latencies of the P 1, P 2 and P 3 were significantly prolonged (p < 0.05) in the subjects above 50 years old. CONCLUSION: The results suggested that the aging effect on the m-ERG should be considered when evaluating retinal function using m-ERGs in basic and clinical studies.
Authors: Janet P Szlyk; Thasarat S Vajaranant; Rimki Rana; Wico W Lai; Jose S Pulido; Jennifer Paliga; Norman P Blair; William Seiple Journal: Doc Ophthalmol Date: 2005 Mar-May Impact factor: 2.379