Literature DB >> 10977159

Surrogacy, rights and duties: a partial commentary.

A V Campbell1.   

Abstract

In response to criticisms of proposed regulation of surrogacy, it is argued that surrogate mothers and providers of fertility services have duties which make the selling of claims to parenthood unethical and which justify regulation of surrogacy arrangements.

Keywords:  Analytical Approach; Genetics and Reproduction; Legal Approach

Mesh：

Year:  2000        PMID： 10977159     DOI： 10.1023/A:1009446827355

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Care Anal        ISSN： 1065-3058


  2 in total

1.  Why commercial surrogate motherhood unethically commodifies women and children: reply to McLachlan and Swales.

Authors:  E S Anderson
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2000

2.  Babies, child bearers and commodification: Anderson, Brazier et al., and the political economy of commercial surrogate motherhood.

Authors:  H V McLachlan; J K Swales
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2000
  2 in total
  3 in total

1.  Surrogate motherhood, rights and duties: a reply to Campbell.

Authors:  H V McLachlan; J K Swales
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2001

Review 2.  Surrogate pregnancy: a guide for Canadian prenatal health care providers.

Authors:  Dan R Reilly
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2007-02-13       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Persons and their bodies: how we should think about human embryos.

Authors:  Hugh V McLachlan
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2002
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.