OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that there is substantial use of a practitioner of alternative/complementary medicine by patients traditionally considered to be underserved. DESIGN: Cross-sectional, self-administered survey study. SETTINGS: Three university hospital-affiliated general ambulatory clinics serving patients of different socioeconomic status and racial origin. SUBJECTS: Five hundred and thirty-six (93% of those attending) consecutive clinic attendees. OUTCOME MEASURES: Past use and desired future use of one or more practitioners of five modalities of alternative/complementary medicine and willingness to pay for these modalities out-of-pocket. RESULTS: Past usage and desired future usage of one or more practitioners of alternative/complementary medicine was comparable at the three clinic sites despite wide differences in socioeconomic status and willingness/ability to pay out-of-pocket for these services. Multivariable analyses revealed lower self-rated health status and female gender (both p < 0.006) but not income, race, age or education as independent, significant predictors of use of a practitioner of alternative/complementary medicine. CONCLUSION: Usage of alternative/complementary medicine is not confined to any well-circumscribed socioeconomic group and is common in patients often considered to be underserved. Self-assessed lower health status is significantly and independently associated with use of a practitioner of alternative/complementary care.
OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that there is substantial use of a practitioner of alternative/complementary medicine by patients traditionally considered to be underserved. DESIGN: Cross-sectional, self-administered survey study. SETTINGS: Three university hospital-affiliated general ambulatory clinics serving patients of different socioeconomic status and racial origin. SUBJECTS: Five hundred and thirty-six (93% of those attending) consecutive clinic attendees. OUTCOME MEASURES: Past use and desired future use of one or more practitioners of five modalities of alternative/complementary medicine and willingness to pay for these modalities out-of-pocket. RESULTS: Past usage and desired future usage of one or more practitioners of alternative/complementary medicine was comparable at the three clinic sites despite wide differences in socioeconomic status and willingness/ability to pay out-of-pocket for these services. Multivariable analyses revealed lower self-rated health status and female gender (both p < 0.006) but not income, race, age or education as independent, significant predictors of use of a practitioner of alternative/complementary medicine. CONCLUSION: Usage of alternative/complementary medicine is not confined to any well-circumscribed socioeconomic group and is common in patients often considered to be underserved. Self-assessed lower health status is significantly and independently associated with use of a practitioner of alternative/complementary care.
Authors: Mohammed Abdullah Al Mansour; Abdullah Mn Al-Bedah; Mohammed Othman AlRukban; Ibrahim S Elsubai; Elsadiq Yousif Mohamed; Ahmed Tawfik El Olemy; Asim Ah Khalil; Mohamed Km Khalil; Meshari Saleh Alqaed; Abdullah Almudaiheem; Waqas Sami Mahmoud; Khalid Altohami Medani; Naseem Akhtar Qureshi Journal: Adv Med Educ Pract Date: 2015-06-03
Authors: Ming-Hwai Lin; Hsiao-Ting Chang; Chun-Yi Tu; Tzeng-Ji Chen; Shinn-Jang Hwang Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2015-08-07 Impact factor: 3.390