Literature DB >> 10976729

Quantification of hepatic and renal cortical echogenicity in clinically normal cats.

W T Drost1, G A Henry, J H Meinkoth, J P Woods, T W Lehenbauer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To quantitatively determine echogenicity of the liver and renal cortex in clinically normal cats. ANIMALS: 17 clinically normal adult cats. PROCEDURE: 3 ultrasonographic images of the liver and the right kidney were digitized from video output from each cat. Without changing the ultrasound machine settings, an image of a tissue-equivalent phantom was digitized. Biopsy specimens of the right renal cortex and liver were obtained for histologic examination. Mean pixel intensities within the region of interest (ROI) on hepatic, renal cortical, and tissue-equivalent phantom ultrasonographic images were determined by histogram analysis. From ultrasonographic images, mean pixel intensities for hepatic and renal cortical ROI were standardized by dividing each mean value by the mean pixel intensity from the tissue-equivalent phantom.
RESULTS: The mean (+/- SD) standardized hepatic echogenicity value was 1.06 +/- 0.02 (95% confidence interval, 1.02 to 1.10). The mean standardized right renal cortical echogenicity value was 1.04 +/- 0.02 (95% confidence interval, 1.01 to 1.08). The mean combined standardized hepatic and renal cortical echogenicity value was 1.02 +/- 0.05 (95% confidence interval, 0.99 to 1.04). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Quantitative determination of hepatic and renal cortical echogenicity in cats is feasible, using histogram analysis, and may be useful for early detection of diffuse parenchymal disease and for serially evaluating disease progression.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10976729     DOI: 10.2460/ajvr.2000.61.1016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Vet Res        ISSN: 0002-9645            Impact factor:   1.156


  6 in total

1.  Ultrasonographic quantification of hepatic-renal echogenicity difference in hepatic steatosis diagnosis.

Authors:  Jing-Houng Wang; Chao-Hung Hung; Fang-Ying Kuo; Hock-Liew Eng; Chien-Hung Chen; Chun-Mo Lee; Sheng-Nan Lu; Tsung-Hui Hu
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2013-07-05       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Ultrasound imaging in an experimental model of fatty liver disease and cirrhosis in rats.

Authors:  Andréia S Lessa; Bruno D Paredes; Juliana V Dias; Adriana B Carvalho; Luiz Fernando Quintanilha; Christina M Takiya; Bernardo R Tura; Guilherme F M Rezende; Antonio C Campos de Carvalho; Célia M C Resende; Regina C S Goldenberg
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2010-01-29       Impact factor: 2.741

3.  Correlation of renal histopathology with renal echogenicity in dogs and cats: an ex-vivo quantitative study.

Authors:  Alessandro Zotti; Tommaso Banzato; Maria Elena Gelain; Cinzia Centelleghe; Calogero Vaccaro; Luca Aresu
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2015-04-25       Impact factor: 2.741

4.  Relationship of diagnostic accuracy of renal cortical echogenicity with renal histopathology in dogs and cats, a quantitative study.

Authors:  Tommaso Banzato; Federico Bonsembiante; Luca Aresu; Alessandro Zotti
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 2.741

5.  The ultrasonographic medullary "rim sign" versus medullary "band sign" in cats and their association with renal disease.

Authors:  Alessia Cordella; Pascaline Pey; Francesco Dondi; Marilyn Dunn; Chiara Caramazza; Mario Cipone; Alessia Diana
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2020-09-05       Impact factor: 3.333

6.  Non-invasive quantification of hepatic fat content in healthy dogs by using proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy and dual gradient echo magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Francesca Del Chicca; Andrea Schwarz; Dieter Meier; Paula Grest; Annette Liesegang; Patrick R Kircher
Journal:  J Vet Sci       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 1.672

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.