Literature DB >> 10974720

Value of magnetic resonance myelography in the diagnosis of disc herniation and spinal stenosis.

M H Pui1, Y A Husen.   

Abstract

Magnetic resonance imaging provides a good-quality image over the entire length of the spine and can assess the morphology of the discs and cord. It is the imaging modality of choice in the investigation of spinal diseases. Magnetic resonance myelography (MRM) is non-invasive, has comparable sensitivity to conventional myelography in visualizing lumbar nerve roots and allows overall assessment of the spinal canal even in the presence of cerebrospinal fluid block. Seventy-two patients with pre-surgical diagnosis of disc herniation were prospectively investigated prior to surgery to determine the value of MRM in the diagnosis of disc herniation and spinal stenosis. The difference between the sensitivity and accuracy of MRI (89.0-95.6%, 89.1-95.7%) and MRM (82.4-89.0%, 82.6-89.1%) was not significant for both observers. There was no significant improvement with the addition of MRM to MRI (91.2-97.8%, 91.3-97.8%). Although MRM did not significantly improve the diagnostic accuracy of MRI, it allowed a better overall view of the dural sac and root sleeves, therefore making it easier to diagnose spinal stenosis and disc herniation in a minority of cases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10974720     DOI: 10.1046/j.1440-1673.2000.00813.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Australas Radiol        ISSN: 0004-8461


  8 in total

1.  Can recumbent magnetic resonance imaging replace myelography or computed tomography myelography for detecting lumbar spinal stenosis?

Authors:  Kanji Sasaki; Kazuhiro Hasegawa; Haruka Shimoda; Ishii Keiji; Takao Homma
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2013-03-30

2.  Magnetic resonance myelography in early postoperative lumbar discectomy: An efficient and cost effective modality.

Authors:  Pankaj R Patel; Bharat R Dave; Ujjval H Deliwala; Ajay Krishnan
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.251

3.  Using Magnetic Resonance Myelography to Improve Interobserver Agreement in the Evaluation of Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis and Root Compression.

Authors:  Haider Najim Al-Tameemi; Sattar Al-Essawi; Mahmud Shukri; Farah Kasim Naji
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2017-04-12

4.  Prognosis Evaluation of MRI Combined with Magnetic Resonance Myelography on Lumbar Disc Herniation after Transforaminal Endoscopic Discectomy.

Authors:  Yi Jiang; Rujun Zuo; Shuai Yuan; Jian Li; Chang Liu; Jiexun Zhang; Ming Ma; Dasheng Li; Yong Hai
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2022-02-21       Impact factor: 2.238

5.  Association Between the Individual and Combined Effects of the GSTM1 and GSTT1 Polymorphisms and Risk of Leukemia: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Ting Hu; Guozhong Zhou; Wenjin Li
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 4.772

6.  Additional Merits of Two-dimensional Single Thick-slice Magnetic Resonance Myelography in Spinal Imaging.

Authors:  Abhishek Aggarwal; Rajiv Azad; Armeen Ahmad; Pankaj Arora; Puneet Gupta
Journal:  J Clin Imaging Sci       Date:  2012-12-31

7.  Noninvasive diagnosis and management of spontaneous intracranial hypotension in patients with marfan syndrome: Case Report and Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Luigi Bassani; Christopher S Graffeo; Navid Behrooz; Vineet Tyagi; Taylor Wilson; Saul Penaranda; David Zagzag; Daniel B Rifkin; Mary Helen Barcellos-Hoff; Girish Fatterpekar; Dimitris Placantonakis
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2014-01-21

8.  Reduction in nerve root compression by the nucleus pulposus after Feng's Spinal Manipulation.

Authors:  Yu Feng; Yan Gao; Wendong Yang; Tianyou Feng
Journal:  Neural Regen Res       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 5.135

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.