Literature DB >> 10974666

Embracing complexity: organicism for the 21st century.

S F Gilbert1, S Sarkar.   

Abstract

Organicism (materialistic holism) has provided the philosophical underpinnings for embryology since the time of Kant. It had influenced the founders of developmental mechanics, and the importance of organicism to embryology was explicitly recognized by such figures as O. Hertwig, H. Spemann, R. Harrison, A. M. Dalq, J. Needham, and C. H. Waddington. Many of the principles of organicism remain in contemporary developmental biology, but they are rarely defined as such. A combination of genetic reductionism and the adoption of holism by unscientific communities has led to the devaluation of organicism as a fruitful heuristic for research. This essay attempts to define organicism, provide a brief history of its importance to experimental embryology, outline some sociologically based reasons for its decline, and document its value in contemporary developmental biology. Based on principles or organicism, developmental biology should become a science of emerging complexity. However, this does mean that some of us will have to learn calculus. Copyright 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10974666     DOI: 10.1002/1097-0177(2000)9999:9999<::AID-DVDY1036>3.0.CO;2-A

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev Dyn        ISSN: 1058-8388            Impact factor:   3.780


  47 in total

1.  Evolutionary modification of development in mammalian teeth: quantifying gene expression patterns and topography.

Authors:  J Jernvall; S V Keränen; I Thesleff
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-12-19       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  A gene network model accounting for development and evolution of mammalian teeth.

Authors:  Isaac Salazar-Ciudad; Jukka Jernvall
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-06-04       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Carcinogenesis and metastasis now in the third dimension--what's in it for pathologists?

Authors:  Carlos Sonnenschein; Ana M Soto
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 4.307

Review 4.  Epigenetics and its implications for behavioral neuroendocrinology.

Authors:  David Crews
Journal:  Front Neuroendocrinol       Date:  2008-02-07       Impact factor: 8.606

5.  Can You Change a Student's Mind in a Course about the Brain? Belief Change Following an Introductory Course in Biological Psychology.

Authors:  Ian A Harrington
Journal:  J Undergrad Neurosci Educ       Date:  2013-10-15

6.  Biology and the systems view. Is there a move towards systems approaches in the life sciences?

Authors:  Bettina Bock von Wülfingen
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 8.807

7.  Individuals at the center of biology: Rudolf Leuckart's Polymorphismus der Individuen and the ongoing narrative of parts and wholes. With an annotated translation.

Authors:  Lynn K Nyhart; Scott Lidgard
Journal:  J Hist Biol       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 1.326

8.  One hundred years of somatic mutation theory of carcinogenesis: is it time to switch?

Authors:  Ana M Soto; Carlos Sonnenschein
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 4.345

9.  Paradoxes in Carcinogenesis: There Is Light at the End of That Tunnel!

Authors:  Ana M Soto; Carlos Sonnenschein
Journal:  Disrupt Sci Technol       Date:  2013-05-01

Review 10.  Malignant Melanoma: Autoimmunity and Supracellular Messaging as New Therapeutic Approaches.

Authors:  Ion G Motofei
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2019-05-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.