Literature DB >> 10973709

Methodological issues associated with tumor marker development. Biostatistical aspects.

.   

Abstract

The search for markers as potential prognostic factors for different stages of disease is becoming a major task in clinical research. Enormous amounts of information on the effectiveness of tumor markers are being published, and many of these results are conflicting and thus adding confusion to the area. In this paper we discuss the problem of multiplicity that we believe is one of the major statistical reasons for the conflicting results. We further review the ROC curve and the area under it as a popular statistical tool for evaluating the ability of a marker to distinguish between two populations. Finally we provide an extension to the ROC analysis when several markers are available.

Entities:  

Year:  2000        PMID: 10973709     DOI: 10.1016/s1078-1439(00)00075-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Oncol        ISSN: 1078-1439            Impact factor:   3.498


  3 in total

Review 1.  Reporting of prognostic studies of tumour markers: a review of published articles in relation to REMARK guidelines.

Authors:  S Mallett; A Timmer; W Sauerbrei; D G Altman
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-12-08       Impact factor: 7.640

2.  Systematic review and REMARK scoring of renal cell carcinoma prognostic circulating biomarker manuscripts.

Authors:  Marco A J Iafolla; Sarah Picardo; Kyaw Aung; Aaron R Hansen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Synovial-Fluid miRNA Signature for Diagnosis of Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis.

Authors:  Nadége Nziza; Eric Jeziorski; Marion Delpont; Maïlys Cren; Hugues Chevassus; Aurélia Carbasse; Perrine Mahe; Hamouda Abassi; Pauline Joly-Monrigal; Eric Schordan; Alain Mangé; Christian Jorgensen; Florence Apparailly; Isabelle Duroux-Richard
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2019-11-26       Impact factor: 6.600

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.