Literature DB >> 10973477

UV-induced inhibition of transcription involves repression of transcription initiation and phosphorylation of RNA polymerase II.

D A Rockx1, R Mason, A van Hoffen, M C Barton, E Citterio, D B Bregman, A A van Zeeland, H Vrieling, L H Mullenders.   

Abstract

Cells from patients with Cockayne syndrome (CS) are hypersensitive to DNA-damaging agents and are unable to restore damage-inhibited RNA synthesis. On the basis of repair kinetics of different types of lesions in transcriptionally active genes, we hypothesized previously that impaired transcription in CS cells is a consequence of defective transcription initiation after DNA damage induction. Here, we investigated the effect of UV irradiation on transcription by using an in vitro transcription system that allowed uncoupling of initiation from elongation events. Nuclear extracts prepared from UV-irradiated or mock-treated normal human and CS cells were assayed for transcription activity on an undamaged beta-globin template. Transcription activity in nuclear extracts closely mimicked kinetics of transcription in intact cells: extracts from normal cells prepared 1 h after UV exposure showed a strongly reduced activity, whereas transcription activity was fully restored in extracts prepared 6 h after treatment. Extracts from CS cells exhibited reduced transcription activity at any time after UV exposure. Reduced transcription activity in extracts coincided with a strong reduction of RNA polymerase II (RNAPII) containing hypophosphorylated C-terminal domain, the form of RNAPII known to be recruited to the initiation complex. These results suggest that inhibition of transcription after UV irradiation is at least partially caused by repression of transcription initiation and not solely by blocked elongation at sites of lesions. Generation of hypophosphorylated RNAPII after DNA damage appears to play a crucial role in restoration of transcription. CS proteins may be required for this process in a yet unknown way.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10973477      PMCID: PMC27054          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.180169797

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  28 in total

1.  Transcription-dependent structural changes in the C-terminal domain of mammalian RNA polymerase subunit IIa/o.

Authors:  P J Laybourn; M E Dahmus
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1989-04-25       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Cells from XP-D and XP-D-CS patients exhibit equally inefficient repair of UV-induced damage in transcribed genes but different capacity to recover UV-inhibited transcription.

Authors:  A van Hoffen; W H Kalle; A de Jong-Versteeg; A R Lehmann; A A van Zeeland; L H Mullenders
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1999-07-15       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  DNA repair. Engagement with transcription.

Authors:  D Bootsma; J H Hoeijmakers
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1993-05-13       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  DNA repair in an active gene: removal of pyrimidine dimers from the DHFR gene of CHO cells is much more efficient than in the genome overall.

Authors:  V A Bohr; C A Smith; D S Okumoto; P C Hanawalt
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  Effects of ultra-violet microbeam irradiation of various sites of HeLa cells on the synthesis of RNA, DNA and protein.

Authors:  S Takeda; S Naruse; R Yatani
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1967-02-18       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  The genetic defect in Cockayne syndrome is associated with a defect in repair of UV-induced DNA damage in transcriptionally active DNA.

Authors:  J Venema; L H Mullenders; A T Natarajan; A A van Zeeland; L V Mayne
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  DNA repair helicase: a component of BTF2 (TFIIH) basic transcription factor.

Authors:  L Schaeffer; R Roy; S Humbert; V Moncollin; W Vermeulen; J H Hoeijmakers; P Chambon; J M Egly
Journal:  Science       Date:  1993-04-02       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Selective removal of transcription-blocking DNA damage from the transcribed strand of the mammalian DHFR gene.

Authors:  I Mellon; G Spivak; P C Hanawalt
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1987-10-23       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 9.  Cockayne syndrome: review of 140 cases.

Authors:  M A Nance; S A Berry
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  1992-01-01

10.  Human general transcription factor IIH phosphorylates the C-terminal domain of RNA polymerase II.

Authors:  H Lu; L Zawel; L Fisher; J M Egly; D Reinberg
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1992-08-20       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  75 in total

Review 1.  Cockayne syndrome group B cellular and biochemical functions.

Authors:  Cecilie Löe Licht; Tinna Stevnsner; Vilhelm A Bohr
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2003-11-24       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 2.  Is post-transcriptional stabilization, splicing and translation of selective mRNAs a key to the DNA damage response?

Authors:  H Christian Reinhardt; Ian G Cannell; Sandra Morandell; Michael B Yaffe
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2011-01-01       Impact factor: 4.534

3.  Transcription-associated breaks in xeroderma pigmentosum group D cells from patients with combined features of xeroderma pigmentosum and Cockayne syndrome.

Authors:  Therina Theron; Maria I Fousteri; Marcel Volker; Lorna W Harries; Elena Botta; Miria Stefanini; Mitsuo Fujimoto; Jaan-Olle Andressoo; Jay Mitchell; Nicolaas G J Jaspers; Lisa D McDaniel; Leon H Mullenders; Alan R Lehmann
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 4.272

4.  CSA-dependent degradation of CSB by the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway establishes a link between complementation factors of the Cockayne syndrome.

Authors:  Regina Groisman; Isao Kuraoka; Odile Chevallier; Nogaye Gaye; Thierry Magnaldo; Kiyoji Tanaka; Alexei F Kisselev; Annick Harel-Bellan; Yoshihiro Nakatani
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2006-06-01       Impact factor: 11.361

5.  Multiple mechanisms contribute to inhibit transcription in response to DNA damage.

Authors:  George F Heine; Andrew A Horwitz; Jeffrey D Parvin
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2008-02-15       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 6.  Hot topics in DNA repair: the molecular basis for different disease states caused by mutations in TFIIH and XPG.

Authors:  Orlando D Schärer
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2008-02-01

7.  Global Inhibition with Specific Activation: How p53 and MYC Redistribute the Transcriptome in the DNA Double-Strand Break Response.

Authors:  Joshua R Porter; Brian E Fisher; Laura Baranello; Julia C Liu; Diane M Kambach; Zuqin Nie; Woo Seuk Koh; Ji Luo; Jayne M Stommel; David Levens; Eric Batchelor
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 17.970

Review 8.  Regulation of DNA damage response pathways by the cullin-RING ubiquitin ligases.

Authors:  Jeffrey Hannah; Pengbo Zhou
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2009-02-23

9.  Cdt2-mediated XPG degradation promotes gap-filling DNA synthesis in nucleotide excision repair.

Authors:  Chunhua Han; Gulzar Wani; Ran Zhao; Jiang Qian; Nidhi Sharma; Jinshan He; Qianzheng Zhu; Qi-En Wang; Altaf A Wani
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 4.534

10.  MAQ1 and 7SK RNA interact with CDK9/cyclin T complexes in a transcription-dependent manner.

Authors:  Annemieke A Michels; Van Trung Nguyen; Alessandro Fraldi; Valérie Labas; Mia Edwards; François Bonnet; Luigi Lania; Olivier Bensaude
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.272

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.