Literature DB >> 10973405

Exploration of physicians' recommendations for activities in chronic low back pain.

J Rainville1, N Carlson, P Polatin, R J Gatchel, A Indahl.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A mailed survey of 142 practicing physicians (63 orthopedic spine surgeons and 79 family physicians) inquiring about their expertise and experience with chronic low back pain, their pain attitudes and beliefs, and recommendations about the appropriate level of function for chronic back pain patients.
OBJECTIVES: To explore physicians' recommendations for activity and work for patients with chronic low back pain and to determine factors that might influence these recommendations. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Physicians continuously are asked to recommend the appropriate level of activities and work for patients with chronic low back pain. Although these recommendations can have a significant impact on patients' lives, little is known about the factors that shape recommendations.
METHODS: Mailed surveys included questions inquiring about the physicians' demographics, training, and experience in low back pain, the Health Care Providers' Pain and Impairment Relationship Scale, and three vignettes of work-disabled, chronic low back pain patients. After each vignette, physicians rated their perceptions of severity of symptoms and pathology and recommendations for work and daily activities through five graded responses. Three mailings were done within 4 weeks to maximize the response rate. The association of each variable with work and activity recommendations was statistically explored. To assess the influence of clinical expertise on recommendations, the responses of orthopedic spine surgeons were compared with those of family physicians. Test-retest reliability was assessed with a second mailing of the questionnaire to all initial responders.
RESULTS: Sixty-five percent of the orthopedic surgeons and 52% of the family physicians responded to the survey. Thirty-nine percent of the initial responders completed the reliability survey. The survey instrument demonstrated modest reliability, with identical recommendations for activities and work occurring 57% of the time. In general, a wide range of activities and work was recommended, with most physicians recommending avoidance of painful activities or greater restrictions. Orthopedic spine surgeons were slightly less restrictive in their activity recommendations compared with family physicians. Most physicians demonstrated some consistency in their pattern of recommendations when compared with their colleagues. Physicians' pain attitudes and belief influenced their recommendations, as did their perception of the severity of the patients' clinical symptoms.
CONCLUSIONS: Physicians' recommendations for activity and work to patients with chronic back pain vary widely and frequently are restrictive. These recommendations reflect personal attitudes of the physicians as well as factors related to the patients' clinical symptoms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10973405     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200009010-00012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  32 in total

Review 1.  Aggressive exercise as treatment for chronic low back pain.

Authors:  Isaac Cohen; James Rainville
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Do clinicians working within the same context make consistent return-to-work recommendations?

Authors:  Yoko Ikezawa; Michele C Battié; Jeremy Beach; Douglas Gross
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2010-09

3.  Do medical student attitudes towards patients with chronic low back pain improve during training? a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Hayley Morris; Cormac Ryan; Douglas Lauchlan; Max Field
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2012-03-19       Impact factor: 2.463

4.  Reliability of the Bryce/Ragnarsson spinal cord injury pain taxonomy.

Authors:  Thomas N Bryce; Marcel P J M Dijkers; Kristjan T Ragnarsson; Adam B Stein; Bojun Chen
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 1.985

5.  Psychometric properties and factor structure of the Spanish version of the HC-PAIRS questionnaire.

Authors:  Julio Domenech; Eva Segura-Ortí; Juan Francisco Lisón; Begoña Espejo-Tort; Daniel Sánchez-Zuriaga
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  The reassuring potential of spinal imaging results: development and testing of a brief, psycho-education intervention for patients attending secondary care.

Authors:  Emma L Karran; Yun-Hom Yau; Susan L Hillier; G Lorimer Moseley
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-11-17       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 7.  Physical exercise interventions to improve disability and return to work in low back pain: current insights and opportunities for improvement.

Authors:  J Bart Staal; James Rainville; Julie Fritz; Willem van Mechelen; Glenn Pransky
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2005-12

8.  Attitudes and beliefs on low back pain in physical therapy education: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Marijke Leysen; Jo Nijs; Paul Van Wilgen; Christophe Demoulin; Wim Dankaerts; Lieven Danneels; Lennard Voogt; Albère Köke; Laurent Pitance; Nathalie Roussel
Journal:  Braz J Phys Ther       Date:  2020-08-13       Impact factor: 3.377

9.  Exercise prescription for chronic back or neck pain: who prescribes it? who gets it? What is prescribed?

Authors:  Janet K Freburger; Timothy S Carey; George M Holmes; Andrea S Wallace; Liana D Castel; Jane D Darter; Anne M Jackman
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2009-02-15

10.  Chronic low back pain: non-clinical factors impacting on management by Irish doctors.

Authors:  B M Fullen; C Doody; G David Baxter; L E Daly; D A Hurley
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2008-06-27       Impact factor: 1.568

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.