Literature DB >> 10972608

Sevoflurane-fentanyl versus etomidate-fentanyl for anesthetic induction in coronary artery bypass graft surgery patients.

K F Cheong1, J M Choy.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the hemodynamic effects of sevoflurane-fentanyl with etomidate-fentanyl during anesthetic induction in patients with coronary artery disease with good left ventricular function.
DESIGN: A prospective randomized trial.
SETTING: University hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty patients scheduled for elective coronary artery bypass graft surgery.
INTERVENTIONS: Patients were allocated randomly to receive either 4% sevoflurane/nitrous oxide 67%/oxygen 33% (sevoflurane group) or etomidate, 0.2 mg/kg, for induction (intravenous group). Both techniques were supplemented by 10 microg/kg of fentanyl and muscle relaxation with pancuronium. Anesthesia was maintained in both groups with 2% sevoflurane/nitrous oxide 67%/oxygen 33%.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Time to loss of consciousness and airway complications during induction were assessed. Hemodynamics were recorded at 1-minute intervals during the induction period up to 5 minutes postintubation. Induction of anesthesia was significantly faster in patients given etomidate compared with patients who received sevoflurane; loss of eyelid reflex was 45 seconds (standard deviation 17 seconds) versus 97 seconds (standard deviation 20 seconds). None of the patients who received sevoflurane had airway complications during the induction period. Both anesthetic induction techniques provided cardiostability with little change in cardiac index (2%). The decrease in mean arterial blood pressure was greater in the patients who received sevoflurane induction (maximal decrease 28% v 14%). The heart rate and filling pressure changes were insignificant.
CONCLUSION: Sevoflurane inhalation induction produced minimal changes in cardiac index and no airway complications in patients with coronary artery disease with good left ventricular function. Induction was faster with etomidate, however, and blood pressure remained higher.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10972608     DOI: 10.1053/jcan.2000.7935

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth        ISSN: 1053-0770            Impact factor:   2.628


  3 in total

Review 1.  [Perioperative implications of heart transplant].

Authors:  H K Eltzschig; B Zwissler; T W Felbinger
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  Hemodynamic responses to etomidate versus ketamine-thiopental sodium combination for anesthetic induction in coronary artery bypass graft surgery patients with low ejection fraction: a double-blind, randomized, clinical trial.

Authors:  Mohammad Reza Habibi; Afshin Gholipour Baradari; Aria Soleimani; Amir Emami Zeydi; Hamid Sharif Nia; Ali Habibi; Naser Onagh
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2014-10-20

Review 3.  Nitrous oxide-based techniques versus nitrous oxide-free techniques for general anaesthesia.

Authors:  Rao Sun; Wen Qin Jia; Peng Zhang; KeHu Yang; Jin Hui Tian; Bin Ma; Yali Liu; Run H Jia; Xiao F Luo; Akira Kuriyama
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-11-06
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.