BACKGROUND: A shortage of organ donors for transplantation has become a serious problem throughout the world. To overcome this problem, transplantations across ABO blood barriers have been performed with some success. In general, however, the graft survival rate for transplantation with ABO incompatibility is lower than that of transplantation with ABO compatibility. Unfortunately, the mechanism by which isohemagglutinins might injure an ABO-incompatible graft remains uncertain. Here, the pre- and posttransplantation anti-AB titers in patients who received transplants from ABO-incompatible living donors are reviewed and the pathological findings are compared. METHODS: One hundred and one patients underwent ABO-incompatible living related kidney transplantation (i-LKT) between January 1989 and October 1999 at our hospital. Plasmapheresis and immunoadsorption were performed in all of the i-LKT patients before the transplantation to remove anti-AB antibodies. A splenectomy was also performed during the operation, followed by the local irradiation of the graft with a dose of 150 rad. The anti-AB titers and pathological findings for 93 i-LKT patients, excluding 8 patients who died, were then examined. RESULTS: Immediately after the i-LKT, the anti-AB titer dropped rapidly to below 1:4 in all 93 cases. Seventy of patients (70/93, 75%) showed no elevation in their anti-AB titer during their follow-up. However, the remaining 23 patients (23/93, 25%) showed a significant elevation of their anti-AB titer to over 1:16. Sixteen of these patients (16/93, 17%) exhibited an anti-AB titer of over 1:32. Out of these 16 patients, 11 patients (11/16, 69%) lost their grafts. The anti-AB titer in the remaining five patients (5/16, 31%) spontaneously decreased without any special treatment. Seven patients (7/93, 8%) exhibited an elevated titer of 1:16. Out of these patients, only one patient (1/7, 14%) lost his graft. The elevated titers in the remaining six patients (6/7, 86%) eventually decreased. The graft function improved in patients whose elevated anti-AB titers eventually decreased. Control patients (ABO-compatible kidney transplant patients) showed a normal elevation of their titer values compared with preoperative titers. Pathological findings showed severe humoral rejections in all cases with high anti-AB titers that lost grafts. Humoral rejection was also detected in most of the patients whose anti-AB titer was elevated to over 1:16 after the transplantation, but excellent renal function was resumed once the titers decreased to below 1:4. CONCLUSIONS: In 23 out of 93 i-LKT patients (25%), the anti-AB titers were significantly elevated after the splenectomy. In view of other reports of i-LKT without splenectomy, we feel that a splenectomy in i-LKT patients might be unnecessary. Pathological evidence suggests that the decrease in the anti-AB titer after transplantation might be the net result of plasmapheresis before the operation and the adsorption of antibodies to the endothelium of the transplanted organ after the operation, neither of which is influenced by a splenectomy.
BACKGROUND: A shortage of organ donors for transplantation has become a serious problem throughout the world. To overcome this problem, transplantations across ABO blood barriers have been performed with some success. In general, however, the graft survival rate for transplantation with ABO incompatibility is lower than that of transplantation with ABO compatibility. Unfortunately, the mechanism by which isohemagglutinins might injure an ABO-incompatible graft remains uncertain. Here, the pre- and posttransplantation anti-AB titers in patients who received transplants from ABO-incompatible living donors are reviewed and the pathological findings are compared. METHODS: One hundred and one patients underwent ABO-incompatible living related kidney transplantation (i-LKT) between January 1989 and October 1999 at our hospital. Plasmapheresis and immunoadsorption were performed in all of the i-LKT patients before the transplantation to remove anti-AB antibodies. A splenectomy was also performed during the operation, followed by the local irradiation of the graft with a dose of 150 rad. The anti-AB titers and pathological findings for 93 i-LKT patients, excluding 8 patients who died, were then examined. RESULTS: Immediately after the i-LKT, the anti-AB titer dropped rapidly to below 1:4 in all 93 cases. Seventy of patients (70/93, 75%) showed no elevation in their anti-AB titer during their follow-up. However, the remaining 23 patients (23/93, 25%) showed a significant elevation of their anti-AB titer to over 1:16. Sixteen of these patients (16/93, 17%) exhibited an anti-AB titer of over 1:32. Out of these 16 patients, 11 patients (11/16, 69%) lost their grafts. The anti-AB titer in the remaining five patients (5/16, 31%) spontaneously decreased without any special treatment. Seven patients (7/93, 8%) exhibited an elevated titer of 1:16. Out of these patients, only one patient (1/7, 14%) lost his graft. The elevated titers in the remaining six patients (6/7, 86%) eventually decreased. The graft function improved in patients whose elevated anti-AB titers eventually decreased. Control patients (ABO-compatible kidney transplant patients) showed a normal elevation of their titer values compared with preoperative titers. Pathological findings showed severe humoral rejections in all cases with high anti-AB titers that lost grafts. Humoral rejection was also detected in most of the patients whose anti-AB titer was elevated to over 1:16 after the transplantation, but excellent renal function was resumed once the titers decreased to below 1:4. CONCLUSIONS: In 23 out of 93 i-LKT patients (25%), the anti-AB titers were significantly elevated after the splenectomy. In view of other reports of i-LKT without splenectomy, we feel that a splenectomy in i-LKT patients might be unnecessary. Pathological evidence suggests that the decrease in the anti-AB titer after transplantation might be the net result of plasmapheresis before the operation and the adsorption of antibodies to the endothelium of the transplanted organ after the operation, neither of which is influenced by a splenectomy.
Authors: Jennifer C Solovan; Heung-Il Oh; Azadeh Alikhani; Shalini Gautam; Katherine Vlasova; Elena Y Korchagina; Nicolai V Bovin; William J Federspiel Journal: Transpl Immunol Date: 2006-09-01 Impact factor: 1.708