Literature DB >> 10971395

Pegylated asparaginase (Oncaspar) in children with ALL: drug monitoring in reinduction according to the ALL/NHL-BFM 95 protocols.

H J Müller1, L Löning, A Horn, D Schwabe, M Gunkel, M Schrappe, V von Schütz, G Henze, J Casimiro da Palma, J Ritter, J P Pinheiro, M Winkelhorst, J Boos.   

Abstract

Hypersensitivity reactions are relevant adverse effects of asparaginase therapy. Therefore, children treated with native Escherichia coli asparaginase in induction therapy of acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) were switched to the pegylated enzyme for reinduction under drug monitoring. Seventy children, including four patients with allergic reactions during induction, were given one dose of Oncaspar 1,000 U/m2 intravenously. Activity was determined every third or fourth day until it dropped below the limit of quantification. In current reinduction protocols [ALL/NHL-Berlin-Frankfurt-Münster (BFM) 95 trials], four doses of 10,000 U/m2 E. coli asparaginase deplete asparagine for about 2-3 weeks, therefore activities of >/= 100 U/l up to day 14 and >/= 50 U/l up to day 21 were targeted. In 66 patients without an allergic reaction during induction, the mean activity was 606 +/- 313 U/l, 232 +/- 211 U/l and 44 +/- 50 U/l after 1, 2 and 3 weeks respectively. In 44/66 patients, activity was >/= 100 U/l after 14 d. A rapid decline in activity was seen in the remaining 22 patients, including 8/22 patients who showed no activity after 1 week. Toxicity was low and comparable to the native enzymes but, in contrast to about 30% of hypersensitivity reactions with conventional reinduction therapy, no allergic reaction was seen. Substituting 4 x 10,000 U/m2 asparaginase medac for one dose of 1,000 U/m2 Oncaspar was safe and well tolerated. Comparable pharmacokinetic treatment intensity was achieved in about two-thirds of patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10971395     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.2000.02187.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Haematol        ISSN: 0007-1048            Impact factor:   6.998


  21 in total

1.  Effective asparagine depletion with pegylated asparaginase results in improved outcomes in adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia: Cancer and Leukemia Group B Study 9511.

Authors:  Meir Wetzler; Ben L Sanford; Joanne Kurtzberg; Divino DeOliveira; Stanley R Frankel; Bayard L Powell; Jonathan E Kolitz; Clara D Bloomfield; Richard A Larson
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2007-01-30       Impact factor: 22.113

2.  A dyad of lymphoblastic lysosomal cysteine proteases degrades the antileukemic drug L-asparaginase.

Authors:  Naina Patel; Shekhar Krishnan; Marc N Offman; Marcin Krol; Catherine X Moss; Carly Leighton; Frederik W van Delft; Mark Holland; Jizhong Liu; Seema Alexander; Clare Dempsey; Hany Ariffin; Monika Essink; Tim O B Eden; Colin Watts; Paul A Bates; Vaskar Saha
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2009-06-08       Impact factor: 14.808

3.  Plasma asparaginase activity and asparagine depletion in acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients treated with pegaspargase on Children's Oncology Group AALL07P4.

Authors:  Reuven J Schore; Meenakshi Devidas; Archie Bleyer; Gregory H Reaman; Naomi Winick; Mignon L Loh; Elizabeth A Raetz; William L Carroll; Stephen P Hunger; Anne L Angiolillo
Journal:  Leuk Lymphoma       Date:  2019-01-10

Review 4.  What makes a good new therapeutic L-asparaginase?

Authors:  Angela Beckett; David Gervais
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 3.312

5.  Population Pharmacokinetics to Model the Time-Varying Clearance of the PEGylated Asparaginase Oncaspar® in Children with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.

Authors:  Gudrun Würthwein; Claudia Lanvers-Kaminsky; Georg Hempel; Silke Gastine; Anja Möricke; Martin Schrappe; Mats O Karlsson; Joachim Boos
Journal:  Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 2.441

6.  A prospective study on drug monitoring of PEGasparaginase and Erwinia asparaginase and asparaginase antibodies in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Authors:  Wing H Tong; Rob Pieters; Gertjan J L Kaspers; D Maroeska W M te Loo; Marc B Bierings; Cor van den Bos; Wouter J W Kollen; Wim C J Hop; Claudia Lanvers-Kaminsky; Mary V Relling; Wim J E Tissing; Inge M van der Sluis
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 7.  Acute lymphoblastic leukemia: optimizing treatment strategies in children.

Authors:  Ajay Vora
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.022

Review 8.  Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationships of asparaginase formulations: the past, the present and recommendations for the future.

Authors:  Vassilios I Avramis; Eduard H Panosyan
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 6.447

9.  The cross-reactivity of anti-asparaginase antibodies against different L-asparaginase preparations.

Authors:  Beata Zalewska-Szewczyk; Agnieszka Gach; Krystyna Wyka; Jerzy Bodalski; Wojciech Młynarski
Journal:  Clin Exp Med       Date:  2009-01-30       Impact factor: 3.984

Review 10.  Anti-PEG antibodies in the clinic: Current issues and beyond PEGylation.

Authors:  Peng Zhang; Fang Sun; Sijun Liu; Shaoyi Jiang
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 9.776

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.