Literature DB >> 10970015

Why are investigations not recommended by practice guidelines ordered at the periodic health examination?

C van Walraven1, V Goel, P Austin.   

Abstract

Evidence-based guidelines recommend few routine investigations for healthy adults at the periodic health examination (PHE). However, small studies indicate that laboratory tests are commonly ordered at the PHE. This study examined PHE laboratory testing that is not recommended by recognized guidelines ('discretionary'). Using administrative data from the universal health care system in Ontario, Canada, we studied 792,844 adults having a PHE in 1996 and the 3,727 physicians who administered them. We measured the number of discretionary laboratory tests per PHE along with the patient and physician factors potentially influencing laboratory testing. A multilevel, multivariate model was used to examine the association between the number of discretionary laboratory tests at the PHE with patient and physician characteristics. A mean of 7.1 discretionary tests (SD 7.1) was ordered per PHE. Renal, haematological, glucose and lipid tests each were conducted in more than a third of PHEs. Testing varied extensively between physicians and was more common in healthy patients. With the exception of age, patient factors had little effect on discretionary testing. However, each physician factor we examined was independently associated with the number of discretionary tests. Physician specialty, practice volume and previous testing patterns had the strongest influence on discretionary testing. Discretionary investigations are common at the PHE. Testing varies extensively between physicians and seems to be driven more by physician than by patient factors. Interventions to modify discretionary test utilization at the PHE should consider these physician factors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10970015     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2753.2000.00245.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract        ISSN: 1356-1294            Impact factor:   2.431


  4 in total

1.  Dissemination of discharge summaries. Not reaching follow-up physicians.

Authors:  Carl van Walraven; Ratika Seth; Andreas Laupacis
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  An introduction to multilevel regression models.

Authors:  P C Austin; V Goel; C van Walraven
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr

3.  Perspective of healthy asymptomatic patients requesting general blood tests from their physicians: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Michal Shaked; Inbar Levkovich; Tamar Adar; Alma Peri; Nir Liviatan
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2019-04-05       Impact factor: 2.497

4.  Sociodemographic correlates of 25-hydroxyvitamin D test utilization in Calgary, Alberta.

Authors:  Lawrence de Koning; Dan Henne; Paul Woods; Brenda R Hemmelgarn; Christopher Naugler
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-08-09       Impact factor: 2.655

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.