Literature DB >> 10970013

Bayesian statistics in medical research: an intuitive alternative to conventional data analysis.

L C Gurrin1, J J Kurinczuk, P R Burton.   

Abstract

Statistical analysis of both experimental and observational data is central to medical research. Unfortunately, the process of conventional statistical analysis is poorly understood by many medical scientists. This is due, in part, to the counter-intuitive nature of the basic tools of traditional (frequency-based) statistical inference. For example, the proper definition of a conventional 95% confidence interval is quite confusing. It is based upon the imaginary results of a series of hypothetical repetitions of the data generation process and subsequent analysis. Not surprisingly, this formal definition is often ignored and a 95% confidence interval is widely taken to represent a range of values that is associated with a 95% probability of containing the true value of the parameter being estimated. Working within the traditional framework of frequency-based statistics, this interpretation is fundamentally incorrect. It is perfectly valid, however, if one works within the framework of Bayesian statistics and assumes a 'prior distribution' that is uniform on the scale of the main outcome variable. This reflects a limited equivalence between conventional and Bayesian statistics that can be used to facilitate a simple Bayesian interpretation based on the results of a standard analysis. Such inferences provide direct and understandable answers to many important types of question in medical research. For example, they can be used to assist decision making based upon studies with unavoidably low statistical power, where non-significant results are all too often, and wrongly, interpreted as implying 'no effect'. They can also be used to overcome the confusion that can result when statistically significant effects are too small to be clinically relevant. This paper describes the theoretical basis of the Bayesian-based approach and illustrates its application with a practical example that investigates the prevalence of major cardiac defects in a cohort of children born using the assisted reproduction technique known as ICSI (intracytoplasmic sperm injection).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10970013     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2753.2000.00216.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract        ISSN: 1356-1294            Impact factor:   2.431


  13 in total

Review 1.  Bayesian methods in reporting and managing Australian clinical indicators.

Authors:  Peter P Howley; Stephen J Hancock; Robert W Gibberd; Sheuwen Chuang; Frank A Tuyl
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 1.337

2.  Bayes and health care research.

Authors:  Peter Allmark
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2004

3.  The statistical analysis of immunohaematological data.

Authors:  Roberto Reverberi
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.443

4.  Bayesian Analysis of the Association between Family-Level Factors and Siblings' Dental Caries.

Authors:  A Wen; R J Weyant; D W McNeil; R J Crout; K Neiswanger; M L Marazita; B Foxman
Journal:  JDR Clin Trans Res       Date:  2017-03-15

5.  A Bayesian approach to estimating causal vaccine effects on binary post-infection outcomes.

Authors:  Jincheng Zhou; Haitao Chu; Michael G Hudgens; M Elizabeth Halloran
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2015-07-20       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Error Rates, Decisive Outcomes and Publication Bias with Several Inferential Methods.

Authors:  Will G Hopkins; Alan M Batterham
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 7.  Antimicrobials for the treatment of drug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii pneumonia in critically ill patients: a systemic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Su Young Jung; Seung Hee Lee; Soo Young Lee; Seungwon Yang; Hayeon Noh; Eun Kyoung Chung; Jangik I Lee
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 9.097

8.  Bayesian analysis of a mastitis control plan to investigate the influence of veterinary prior beliefs on clinical interpretation.

Authors:  M J Green; W J Browne; L E Green; A J Bradley; K A Leach; J E Breen; G F Medley
Journal:  Prev Vet Med       Date:  2009-07-02       Impact factor: 2.670

9.  Combination of Modafinil and d-amphetamine for the Treatment of Cocaine Dependence: A Preliminary Investigation.

Authors:  Joy M Schmitz; Nuvan Rathnayaka; Charles E Green; F Gerard Moeller; Anne E Dougherty; John Grabowski
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2012-08-30       Impact factor: 4.157

10.  Factors affecting the cost-effectiveness of on-farm culture prior to the treatment of clinical mastitis in dairy cows.

Authors:  P M Down; A J Bradley; J E Breen; M J Green
Journal:  Prev Vet Med       Date:  2017-07-10       Impact factor: 2.670

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.